Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
To:     Tamir Carmeli <carmeli.tamir@gmail.com>
Cc:     joe@perches.com, jthumshirn@suse.de,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
        martin.petersen@oracle.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fat: New macros to determine the FAT variant (32, 16 or 12)
References: <1544470917-6443-1-git-send-email-carmeli.tamir@gmail.com>
        <1544470917-6443-3-git-send-email-carmeli.tamir@gmail.com>
        <906167f7ca975d437ff9868333d8bf1e86b934a7.camel@perches.com>
        <87sgz0dci0.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp>
        <CAKxm1-G7WpJV0_3=TLyY_JMN=Wz1GkM2w6buc6ez+WUZ_tyEhg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Dec 2018 18:49:28 +0900
In-Reply-To: <CAKxm1-G7WpJV0_3=TLyY_JMN=Wz1GkM2w6buc6ez+WUZ_tyEhg@mail.gmail.com>
        (Tamir Carmeli's message of "Fri, 14 Dec 2018 10:14:35 +0200")
Message-ID: <87efakcuaf.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Tamir Carmeli <carmeli.tamir@gmail.com> writes:

> I just want to make sure, is there a reason why I shouldn't delete
> FAT_FIRST_ENT, as Joe Perches commented?

FAT_FIRST_ENT() was used to check if fat spec compliance. But in real
world, there are too many implementations that didn't follow spec.

Well, so, now FAT_FIRST_ENT() is pointed only from comment. The reason
is only for this comment.

Thanks.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>