Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 036/142] netfilter: nf_conncount: use spin_lock_bh instead of spin_lock
Date:   Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:58:41 +0100
Message-Id: <20181214115748.492248333@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20181214115747.053633987@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20181214115747.053633987@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit fd3e71a9f71e232181a225301a75936373636ccc ]

conn_free() holds lock with spin_lock() and it is called by both
nf_conncount_lookup() and nf_conncount_gc_list(). nf_conncount_lookup()
is called from bottom-half context and nf_conncount_gc_list() from
process context. So that spin_lock() call is not safe. Hence
conn_free() should use spin_lock_bh() instead of spin_lock().

test commands:
   %nft add table ip filter
   %nft add chain ip filter input { type filter hook input priority 0\; }
   %nft add rule filter input meter test { ip saddr ct count over 2 } \
	   counter

splat looks like:
[  461.996507] ================================
[  461.998999] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[  461.998999] 4.19.0-rc6+ #22 Not tainted
[  461.998999] --------------------------------
[  461.998999] inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[  461.998999] kworker/0:2/134 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
[  461.998999] 00000000a71a559a (&(&list->list_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: conn_free+0x69/0x2b0 [nf_conncount]
[  461.998999] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
[  461.998999]   _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70
[  461.998999]   nf_conncount_add+0x28a/0x520 [nf_conncount]
[  461.998999]   nft_connlimit_eval+0x401/0x580 [nft_connlimit]
[  461.998999]   nft_dynset_eval+0x32b/0x590 [nf_tables]
[  461.998999]   nft_do_chain+0x497/0x1430 [nf_tables]
[  461.998999]   nft_do_chain_ipv4+0x255/0x330 [nf_tables]
[  461.998999]   nf_hook_slow+0xb1/0x160
[ ... ]
[  461.998999] other info that might help us debug this:
[  461.998999]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  461.998999]
[  461.998999]        CPU0
[  461.998999]        ----
[  461.998999]   lock(&(&list->list_lock)->rlock);
[  461.998999]   <Interrupt>
[  461.998999]     lock(&(&list->list_lock)->rlock);
[  461.998999]
[  461.998999]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[  461.998999]
[ ... ]

Fixes: 5c789e131cbb ("netfilter: nf_conncount: Add list lock and gc worker, and RCU for init tree search")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c
index 02ca7df793f5..71b1f4f99580 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c
@@ -106,15 +106,15 @@ nf_conncount_add(struct nf_conncount_list *list,
 	conn->zone = *zone;
 	conn->cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
 	conn->jiffies32 = (u32)jiffies;
-	spin_lock(&list->list_lock);
+	spin_lock_bh(&list->list_lock);
 	if (list->dead == true) {
 		kmem_cache_free(conncount_conn_cachep, conn);
-		spin_unlock(&list->list_lock);
+		spin_unlock_bh(&list->list_lock);
 		return NF_CONNCOUNT_SKIP;
 	}
 	list_add_tail(&conn->node, &list->head);
 	list->count++;
-	spin_unlock(&list->list_lock);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&list->list_lock);
 	return NF_CONNCOUNT_ADDED;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conncount_add);
@@ -132,10 +132,10 @@ static bool conn_free(struct nf_conncount_list *list,
 {
 	bool free_entry = false;
 
-	spin_lock(&list->list_lock);
+	spin_lock_bh(&list->list_lock);
 
 	if (list->count == 0) {
-		spin_unlock(&list->list_lock);
+		spin_unlock_bh(&list->list_lock);
                 return free_entry;
 	}
 
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static bool conn_free(struct nf_conncount_list *list,
 	if (list->count == 0)
 		free_entry = true;
 
-	spin_unlock(&list->list_lock);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&list->list_lock);
 	call_rcu(&conn->rcu_head, __conn_free);
 	return free_entry;
 }
-- 
2.19.1