Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266085AbUAVFNO (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:13:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265951AbUAVFNN (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:13:13 -0500 Received: from nat-pool-bos.redhat.com ([66.187.230.200]:46809 "EHLO chimarrao.boston.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266085AbUAVFNI (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:13:08 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:13:03 -0500 (EST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com To: Mike Fedyk cc: Dave Jones , Zan Lynx , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [OT] Confirmation Spam Blocking was: List 'linux-dvb' closed to public posts In-Reply-To: <20040121213027.GN23765@srv-lnx2600.matchmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 881 Lines: 22 On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Mike Fedyk wrote: > What do you think about individual email (non-list) using a confirmation > based spam blocking system. > > I currently use spamassassin to filter my messages, but I saw recently a > project that asks you to reply to a confirmation message if you're not > already on the white-list. That used to be fairly ok, until the introduction of virusses-with-forged-sender a year or two ago ... -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/