Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266014AbUAVIbn (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2004 03:31:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266018AbUAVIbn (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2004 03:31:43 -0500 Received: from pdbn-d9bb9e99.pool.mediaWays.net ([217.187.158.153]:11784 "EHLO citd.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266014AbUAVIaA (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2004 03:30:00 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:29:50 +0100 From: Matthias Schniedermeyer To: Pavel Machek Cc: Bart Samwel , Timothy Miller , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [OT] Redundancy eliminating file systems, breaking MD5, donating money to OSDL Message-ID: <20040122082950.GA7249@citd.de> References: <4008480F.70206@techsource.com> <200401162037.i0GKbgWY005453@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <4008509B.2060707@techsource.com> <200401171415.31645.bart@samwel.tk> <20040120192114.GA30755@citd.de> <20040122001259.GA300@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040122001259.GA300@elf.ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1527 Lines: 45 On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 01:12:59AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > There is one fundemental braino in the discussion. > > > > Only HALF the bits are for preventing "accidental" collisions. (The > > "birthday" thing). The rest is for preventing to "brute force" an input > > that produces the same MD5.(*) > > > > So MD5 has only 2**64 Bits against accidental collsions > > Btw. I already had (a/the) MD5 collision(*2) in my life. > > > > So you'd need SHA256 or SHA512 to be "really sure(tm)". > > > > > > > > *: AFAIR i read this in the specs of SHA1 (160 bits). So i guess this is > > also true for MD5. > > > > *2: I had a direcory of about 1,5 Million images and "md5sum"med them to > > eliminate doubles. The Log-file, at one point, had the same md5sum as > > one of the pictures. > > Do you have a copy? I believe *many* people would like to see that > one. Unfortunatly not, and reconstruction is impossibel(tm). "Back then(more than half a year ago)" i didn't see that as important. Bis denn -- Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/