Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sun, 16 Dec 2018 11:13:40 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <20181216.111340.1916211375637201418.davem@davemloft.net>
To:     pabeni@redhat.com
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, pjt@google.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ecree@solarflare.com,
        dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: mitigate retpoline overhead
From:   David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <2444a44091ae292166c6cad1e31fd85ed2b77fe7.camel@redhat.com>
References: <cover.1544784419.git.pabeni@redhat.com>
        <20181215.132333.867660599141318055.davem@davemloft.net>
        <2444a44091ae292166c6cad1e31fd85ed2b77fe7.camel@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 19:55:40 +0100

> Again, I messed it! I'm really sorry to waste everybody's time.
> I was unable to give proper coverage with different configs. I tested
> vs.:
> 
> CONFIG_IPV6=ymn
> CONFIG_INET=yn
> 
> but
> 
> # CONFIG_RETPOLINE is not set
> 
> fooled me. The following patch should fix.

Please submit this formally with a proper signoff and let's see where
it goes.