Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp1928528imu; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 12:11:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VH6c1SMmayeq2DGM4wveuaPL4iLwP+bOReTKv9qb1phaQZzR2VVy53sDU2gkYVhcZY4qX2 X-Received: by 2002:a62:4549:: with SMTP id s70mr10220415pfa.233.1544991107223; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 12:11:47 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544991107; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0PzG+Q/4ucwHVs/nhPisF6zqCgVDMBXDGH8x6Xk59N3r3s2FGffc9L4e/6MMmrmDKt 77Xtwuu1EYEyTR3Y9Ig7svUBsLzaonCbl3dDQLwU+VD5XzPeRPys8fUS7hTCodKWVqL1 qG1Pp2IplsZWqagt0FsXbac3NSLiK8/rW/vipOAD4pBlrfV3oucaDVSosXgMqyWRoQwM Q+3WCyPCznw58GjxlxdqV+lTZFKEdcnlwJyB7sSa5Dx1Om461OZwBeJA3p4Rat/agsCT 4f4+zOjhT+NyUYDaPzt78i2Skj6Mu8qZNYE/d728LvLl35dawXV/ZKDV3pGBhKu0KUaY ypVA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :spamdiagnosticmetadata:spamdiagnosticoutput:content-language :accept-language:in-reply-to:references:message-id:date:thread-index :thread-topic:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=PfqS2TdFslOzhmnGI67uSe8vhnl+JhEdbQB+MDgg01E=; b=owZYRz5pqzyQJ7gg86iLqlIpLM4hhLr0JWg5taMO5gJaS4DzEymXJVFuXOn72HgYsA D3fR7px8kAR1lYjlb6OZvNlyiOVoPlUF3hmOthz2PabLqaKXYrVDom6E5Y7CpVcOqu3k eLo+Qhy8NE1fRnMcuqz2u+8dqpgTqOgcxzhRsEH5tPyvy2Tsaw5LiF4mx38j/H6lgQb0 p6ssmKOcUzLcRSEZWOHoWB3d+tqMJcx2oIuVo6tnsxQXwLbUrv+kK+U8crRAyPlqSaDl Pl5SbImYOeoxpfdA8O9/aC0oNYi66S/13YJVp8rlfi7X3NY8c2JZxBfzPfLXDUbyt9H/ te3A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@wavesemi.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector1-wavecomp-com header.b="k/86CLfL"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 44si9089598plc.110.2018.12.16.12.11.31; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 12:11:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@wavesemi.onmicrosoft.com header.s=selector1-wavecomp-com header.b="k/86CLfL"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730888AbeLPUKG (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 16 Dec 2018 15:10:06 -0500 Received: from mail-eopbgr820104.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.82.104]:59904 "EHLO NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730746AbeLPUKF (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Dec 2018 15:10:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wavesemi.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-wavecomp-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=PfqS2TdFslOzhmnGI67uSe8vhnl+JhEdbQB+MDgg01E=; b=k/86CLfLulUMGl8RVWvAzg8FFxkH7vz34pChgPNiFxi5AnOlZpLajZkOriCS9cwDO9rN+Q9RcqpkBkma2IJN2hjjXrLJUX/QMv5cfarAno3dConEKDnu+X/jTpwLrc+ZG5vPaUqlubpu6Lo82trpyngFVzrDo0wO1sHrvj2bGAs= Received: from MWHPR2201MB1277.namprd22.prod.outlook.com (10.174.162.17) by MWHPR2201MB1408.namprd22.prod.outlook.com (10.172.63.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1425.22; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 20:10:01 +0000 Received: from MWHPR2201MB1277.namprd22.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c07a:a95:8ba9:8435]) by MWHPR2201MB1277.namprd22.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c07a:a95:8ba9:8435%7]) with mapi id 15.20.1425.021; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 20:10:01 +0000 From: Paul Burton To: "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , Greg Kroah-Hartman CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Paul Burton , Daniel Jedrychowski , Marek Vasut , "linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" , stable Subject: [PATCH] Revert "serial: 8250: Fix clearing FIFOs in RS485 mode again" Thread-Topic: [PATCH] Revert "serial: 8250: Fix clearing FIFOs in RS485 mode again" Thread-Index: AQHUlXtT5YTLq052+E6wpTcC1lM1kg== Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 20:10:01 +0000 Message-ID: <20181216200833.27928-1-paul.burton@mips.com> References: <20181213174834.kxdy6fphaeoivqgh@pburton-laptop> In-Reply-To: <20181213174834.kxdy6fphaeoivqgh@pburton-laptop> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: BYAPR07CA0052.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:60::29) To MWHPR2201MB1277.namprd22.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:24::17) authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pburton@wavecomp.com; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-originating-ip: [2601:647:4100:4687:84d1:277a:c6e5:ae34] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;MWHPR2201MB1408;6:5YZPEk5lubHhqfDnNgedD2GXVY1YGSWr6TrHtbMSN3yw+wHScnkquRt8eVMvEwMTaIWPiPtiT1Gd1S6qzsTBmyzOVDsCflcmk40pZSVZaI4XrfwZLwj5Zk4zlYQQVf5m2CeZ240Nv9CgNXiBmBaQqWtQ40q71tOD8HQNQtZAYWutTiDA6O6Ts5USKdtXqT62nnHOHntcGvMbES1ozV9FIFFWRWHfeGrhU54hKtGqEZcoYZ5Pxi5p9Beb7Pjz1/GiC2pjovgiMXSa6C2VVVtUFpITKHr88gd/wH9Gx5dxb/HuXLOT+VhQeXopO7FqbP4h64HqAIlQAm7ksG0lw7rapUyBYCyKFw4fhnsqpz+P4W6P2gOdyFL/Ta1fI7S6rpcfjVI/atjJvbdqX7VM7G+8H3/EtqLbd7nC8ck6aDEXRcgNNE0G+WXZrKbjQBHDKhY0fzc+j7O8NyEB1k0gK372jw==;5:IdvDeKCbhvwbGvUxy+UnAlg+m5+qRVHqhBdkzP9dpWyhomudWyEdGpUVtaX87Qju5nob2wvfoIo4Dn28GLUgOXpRVEJwLcPY0MHzwNiiO9ud8FNXBS48mERe5yF/G+S0kstvRTGIalMzWSB/ukskBBJOdTaGcDHi8ox0euKNAr4=;7:0hMoCSgRx5f66S09bvi+zRDJa2DDbRoOi4zUNRufIIQ0/Ri9u9bCxGUPIulix8nP0XTJYyi4V4OA5A/ssK/RY0YU6MHEwket8Lz34wwAw+h3/ksHL+Aj/dhSj7ScszwCDkbMNpi3meDcLY4dagQw6w== x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 094763a3-df16-44da-873e-08d6639275b0 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(7021145)(8989299)(4534185)(7022145)(4603075)(4627221)(201702281549075)(8990200)(7048125)(7024125)(7027125)(7023125)(5600074)(711020)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020);SRVR:MWHPR2201MB1408; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR2201MB1408: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(3230021)(999002)(5005020)(6040522)(2401047)(8121501046)(3002001)(93006095)(10201501046)(3231475)(944501520)(52105112)(148016)(149066)(150057)(6041310)(2016111802025)(20161123558120)(20161123562045)(20161123564045)(20161123560045)(6043046)(201708071742011)(7699051)(76991095);SRVR:MWHPR2201MB1408;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:MWHPR2201MB1408; x-forefront-prvs: 0888B1D284 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(979002)(396003)(39830400003)(136003)(376002)(346002)(366004)(199004)(189003)(1076002)(575784001)(36756003)(6116002)(446003)(2616005)(25786009)(106356001)(5660300001)(39060400002)(7736002)(305945005)(52116002)(105586002)(76176011)(11346002)(476003)(4326008)(386003)(110136005)(316002)(102836004)(6506007)(8676002)(54906003)(81166006)(81156014)(2501003)(46003)(2906002)(44832011)(99286004)(42882007)(68736007)(486006)(6306002)(71200400001)(6486002)(8936002)(14454004)(71190400001)(6436002)(97736004)(508600001)(53936002)(14444005)(256004)(186003)(966005)(6512007)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:MWHPR2201MB1408;H:MWHPR2201MB1277.namprd22.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;LANG:en;PTR:InfoNoRecords;A:1;MX:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: wavecomp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: /guYwgRtrmv6VOLDW65smL2G3s1OB/vLFnYfHSi0qR3yVFVkKIzM24M02r1CGD5sJGZWWVEDOul3JmubqatyqczOqFMcIwDNSuDk1WpPrPBZA+5+sq4JH+MVX4KOyuRl/fhxn2b6nqXMDcX36voJ/zaG7WiU8PoPqNJXkZ69NWD57AMFmLcaW6MLscD/CNGHr2xJG64xur9QogwanhHwwanhuHnQ0uEmdEabowz2nW5G7fQQZ59Hixy2YjuHW8j1nlbgLUMUGJkIxM+gqqThRlUmiPrHwC1pWrf04UxfqQSDPiTUhBPDe22eFdO4Pd/z spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: mips.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 094763a3-df16-44da-873e-08d6639275b0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Dec 2018 20:10:01.4444 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 463607d3-1db3-40a0-8a29-970c56230104 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR2201MB1408 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Commit f6aa5beb45be ("serial: 8250: Fix clearing FIFOs in RS485 mode again") makes a change to FIFO clearing code which its commit message suggests was intended to be specific to use with RS485 mode, however: 1) The change made does not just affect __do_stop_tx_rs485(), it also affects other uses of serial8250_clear_fifos() including paths for starting up, shutting down or auto-configuring a port regardless of whether it's an RS485 port or not. 2) It makes the assumption that resetting the FIFOs is a no-op when FIFOs are disabled, and as such it checks for this case & explicitly avoids setting the FIFO reset bits when the FIFO enable bit is clear. A reading of the PC16550D manual would suggest that this is OK since the FIFO should automatically be reset if it is later enabled, but we support many 16550-compatible devices and have never required this auto-reset behaviour for at least the whole git era. Starting to rely on it now seems risky, offers no benefit, and indeed breaks at least the Ingenic JZ4780's UARTs which reads garbage when the RX FIFO is enabled if we don't explicitly reset it. 3) By only resetting the FIFOs if they're enabled, the behaviour of serial8250_do_startup() during boot now depends on what the value of FCR is before the 8250 driver is probed. This in itself seems questionable and leaves us with FCR=3D0 & no FIFO reset if the UART was used by 8250_early, otherwise it depends upon what the bootloader left behind. 4) Although the naming of serial8250_clear_fifos() may be unclear, it is clear that callers of it expect that it will disable FIFOs. Both serial8250_do_startup() & serial8250_do_shutdown() contain comments to that effect, and other callers explicitly re-enable the FIFOs after calling serial8250_clear_fifos(). The premise of that patch that disabling the FIFOs is incorrect therefore seems wrong. For these reasons, this reverts commit f6aa5beb45be ("serial: 8250: Fix clearing FIFOs in RS485 mode again"). Signed-off-by: Paul Burton Fixes: f6aa5beb45be ("serial: 8250: Fix clearing FIFOs in RS485 mode again"= ). Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Daniel Jedrychowski Cc: Marek Vasut Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable # 4.10+ --- I did suggest an alternative approach which would rename serial8250_clear_fifos() and split it into 2 variants - one that disables FIFOs & one that does not, then use the latter in __do_stop_tx_rs485(): https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181213014805.77u5dzydo23cm6fq@pburton-laptop= / However I have no access to the OMAP3 hardware that Marek's patch was attempting to fix & have heard nothing back with regards to him testing that approach, so here's a simple revert that fixes the Ingenic JZ4780. I've marked for stable back to v4.10 presuming that this is how far the broken patch may be backported, given that this is where commit 2bed8a8e7072 ("Clearing FIFOs in RS485 emulation mode causes subsequent transmits to break") that it tried to fix was introduced. --- drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c | 29 +++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/= 8250_port.c index f776b3eafb96..3f779d25ec0c 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c @@ -552,30 +552,11 @@ static unsigned int serial_icr_read(struct uart_8250_= port *up, int offset) */ static void serial8250_clear_fifos(struct uart_8250_port *p) { - unsigned char fcr; - unsigned char clr_mask =3D UART_FCR_CLEAR_RCVR | UART_FCR_CLEAR_XMIT; - if (p->capabilities & UART_CAP_FIFO) { - /* - * Make sure to avoid changing FCR[7:3] and ENABLE_FIFO bits. - * In case ENABLE_FIFO is not set, there is nothing to flush - * so just return. Furthermore, on certain implementations of - * the 8250 core, the FCR[7:3] bits may only be changed under - * specific conditions and changing them if those conditions - * are not met can have nasty side effects. One such core is - * the 8250-omap present in TI AM335x. - */ - fcr =3D serial_in(p, UART_FCR); - - /* FIFO is not enabled, there's nothing to clear. */ - if (!(fcr & UART_FCR_ENABLE_FIFO)) - return; - - fcr |=3D clr_mask; - serial_out(p, UART_FCR, fcr); - - fcr &=3D ~clr_mask; - serial_out(p, UART_FCR, fcr); + serial_out(p, UART_FCR, UART_FCR_ENABLE_FIFO); + serial_out(p, UART_FCR, UART_FCR_ENABLE_FIFO | + UART_FCR_CLEAR_RCVR | UART_FCR_CLEAR_XMIT); + serial_out(p, UART_FCR, 0); } } =20 @@ -1467,7 +1448,7 @@ static void __do_stop_tx_rs485(struct uart_8250_port = *p) * Enable previously disabled RX interrupts. */ if (!(p->port.rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX)) { - serial8250_clear_fifos(p); + serial8250_clear_and_reinit_fifos(p); =20 p->ier |=3D UART_IER_RLSI | UART_IER_RDI; serial_port_out(&p->port, UART_IER, p->ier); --=20 2.20.0