Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 17 Dec 2018 06:41:01 -0800
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>, phillip@squashfs.org.uk,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] squashfs: enable __GFP_FS in ->readpage to prevent hang
 in mem alloc
Message-ID: <20181217144101.GN10600@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <20181204020840.49576-1-houtao1@huawei.com>
 <20181215143824.GJ10600@bombadil.infradead.org>
 <69457a5a-79c9-4950-37ae-eff7fa4f949a@huawei.com>
 <20181217035157.GK10600@bombadil.infradead.org>
 <20181217093337.GC30879@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <00ff5d2d-a50f-4730-db8a-cea3d7a3eef7@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
 <20181217122546.GL10600@bombadil.infradead.org>
 <20181217141044.GP30879@dhcp22.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181217141044.GP30879@dhcp22.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 03:10:44PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 17-12-18 04:25:46, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > It's worth noticing that squashfs _is_ in fact holding a page locked in
> > squashfs_copy_cache() when it calls grab_cache_page_nowait().  I'm not
> > sure if this will lead to trouble or not because I'm insufficiently
> > familiar with the reclaim path.
> 
> Hmm, this is more interesting then. If there is any memcg accounted
> allocation down that path _and_ the squashfs writeout can lock more
> pages and mark them writeback before they are really sent to the storage
> then we have a problem. See [1]
> 
> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181213092221.27270-1-mhocko@kernel.org

Squashfs is read only, so it'll never have dirty pages and never do
writeout.

But ... maybe the GFP flags being used for grab_cache_page_nowait() are
wrong.  It does, after all, say "nowait".  Perhaps it shouldn't be trying
direct reclaim at all, but rather fail earlier.  Like this:

+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -1550,6 +1550,8 @@ struct page *pagecache_get_page(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t offset,
                        gfp_mask |= __GFP_WRITE;
                if (fgp_flags & FGP_NOFS)
                        gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_FS;
+               if (fgp_flags & FGP_NOWAIT)
+                       gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
 
                page = __page_cache_alloc(gfp_mask);
                if (!page)