Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:40:56 +0900
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Add caller information to printk() output.
Message-ID: <20181217154056.GA515@tigerII.localdomain>
References: <20181203150603.cdqii263e4kmmibo@pathway.suse.cz>
 <b38c6957-c3c1-54fc-781e-06d7eed6a9b1@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
 <20181204152724.ypk44mi4a56nrud4@pathway.suse.cz>
 <459018db-763b-9520-ead2-2c0d5975fbf3@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
 <20181210130930.bas4fozjhe3dc5nu@pathway.suse.cz>
 <c5b5d660-d217-35f0-c4f1-7252367934d1@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
 <e3f69846-ef08-c8f5-368f-4dada13c9970@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
 <20181213121847.mwlr2vyv6qzclhk6@pathway.suse.cz>
 <20181213124255.GB3053@tigerII.localdomain>
 <20181217145452.3kev4rmo2l5lt2qy@pathway.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181217145452.3kev4rmo2l5lt2qy@pathway.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On (12/17/18 15:54), Petr Mladek wrote:
> Now, I always felt that the "from" name was a bit strange but
> nothing better came to my mind until today.

Could be printk_caller, could be printk_origin. I don't have strong
preferences.

> I would like to rename "from" to "caller", see the patch below.
> If you agree, I could push it on top or I could even squash it
> into the original patch.

Can we please squash or, better yet, ask Tetsuo to resend a new, renamed
version? An immediate follow up patch that completely renames a just added
feature feels like as if we failed to communicate it the usual way.

	-ss