Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 17 Dec 2018 20:01:02 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc:     x86@kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com,
        nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, serge.ayoun@intel.com,
        shay.katz-zamir@intel.com, haitao.huang@linux.intel.com,
        andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
        kai.svahn@intel.com, mark.shanahan@intel.com, luto@amacapital.net,
        Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
        "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" 
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 18/23] platform/x86: Intel SGX driver
Message-ID: <20181217180102.GA12560@linux.intel.com>
References: <20181116010412.23967-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
 <20181116010412.23967-19-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
 <7d5cde02-4649-546b-0f03-2d6414bb80b5@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7d5cde02-4649-546b-0f03-2d6414bb80b5@intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 09:45:40AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > +struct sgx_encl *sgx_encl_alloc(struct sgx_secs *secs)
> > +{
> ...
> > +	kref_init(&encl->refcount);
> > +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&encl->add_page_reqs);
> > +	INIT_RADIX_TREE(&encl->page_tree, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	mutex_init(&encl->lock);
> > +	INIT_WORK(&encl->add_page_work, sgx_add_page_worker);
> > +
> > +	encl->mm = current->mm;  <---------------------------------> +	encl->base = secs->base;
> > +	encl->size = secs->size;
> > +	encl->ssaframesize = secs->ssa_frame_size;
> > +	encl->backing = backing;
> > +
> > +	return encl;
> > +}
> 
> How is this OK without taking a reference on the mm?
> 
> I have a feeling a bunch of your bugs with the mmu notifiers and so
> forth are because the refcounting is wrong here.
> 
> Sean's SGX_ENCL_MM_RELEASED would, I think be unnecessary if you just
> take a refcount here and release it when the enclave is destroyed.

Right, atomic_inc(encl->mm->count) here and once when releasing.

The we would not even need the whole mmu notifier in the first place.

/Jarkko