Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 17 Dec 2018 20:08:34 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc:     Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/88] 4.4.168-stable review
Message-ID: <20181217190834.GB13773@kroah.com>
References: <20181214115702.151309521@linuxfoundation.org>
 <dfd49bfd-359a-7f5e-8332-5e6ad6da21cd@roeck-us.net>
 <20181215080729.GG10074@kroah.com>
 <c5862b36-beae-4810-fb33-4b646e96378b@roeck-us.net>
 <1545004693.19315.66.camel@codethink.co.uk>
 <20181217090533.GA12938@kroah.com>
 <ca64083a-158f-7faf-d6e7-566336ad03d0@roeck-us.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <ca64083a-158f-7faf-d6e7-566336ad03d0@roeck-us.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 05:46:01AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 12/17/18 1:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 11:58:13PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2018-12-15 at 07:45 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > On 12/15/18 12:07 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 06:10:29PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > > > On 12/14/18 3:59 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.168 release.
> > > > > > > There are 88 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > > > to this one.??If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > > > let me know.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sun Dec 16 11:56:41 UTC 2018.
> > > > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Build results:
> > > > > > 	total: 170 pass: 145 fail: 25
> > > > > > Failed builds:
> > > > > > 	arm:allnoconfig
> > > > > > 	arm:tinyconfig
> > > > > > 	arm:efm32_defconfig
> > > > > > 	blackfin:defconfig
> > > > > > 	blackfin:BF561-EZKIT-SMP_defconfig
> > > > > > 	c6x:dsk6455_defconfig
> > > > > > 	c6x:evmc6457_defconfig
> > > > > > 	c6x:evmc6678_defconfig
> > > > > > 	h8300:allnoconfig
> > > > > > 	h8300:tinyconfig
> > > > > > 	h8300:edosk2674_defconfig
> > > > > > 	h8300:h8300h-sim_defconfig
> > > > > > 	h8300:h8s-sim_defconfig
> > > > > > 	m68k:allnoconfig
> > > > > > 	m68k:tinyconfig
> > > > > > 	m68k:m5272c3_defconfig
> > > > > > 	m68k:m5307c3_defconfig
> > > > > > 	m68k:m5249evb_defconfig
> > > > > > 	m68k:m5407c3_defconfig
> > > > > > 	microblaze:nommu_defconfig
> > > > > > 	microblaze:allnoconfig
> > > > > > 	microblaze:tinyconfig
> > > > > > 	sh:defconfig
> > > > > > 	sh:allnoconfig
> > > > > > 	sh:tinyconfig
> > > > > > Qemu test results:
> > > > > > 	total: 288 pass: 288 fail: 0
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > mm/nommu.c: In function '__get_user_pages_unlocked':
> > > > > > mm/nommu.c:211:49: error: 'write' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > > > > mm/nommu.c:211:56: error: 'force' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > > > > mm/nommu.c:212:9: warning: passing argument 7 of 'get_user_pages' from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
> > > > > > mm/nommu.c:185:6: note: expected 'struct vm_area_struct **' but argument is of type 'struct page **'
> > > > > > mm/nommu.c:212:9: error: too many arguments to function 'get_user_pages'
> > > > > > mm/nommu.c:185:6: note: declared here
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Details are available at https://kerneltests.org/builders/.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Ugh, I'll dig through this later on today, we must be missing something
> > > > > with those backports that Ben did...
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 69ce144e5c3a ("mm: replace get_user_pages() write/force parameters
> > > > with gup_flags") seems to have missed converting a call of
> > > > get_user_pages().
> > > 
> > > Right.  This was changed earlier upstream in commit cde70140fed8
> > > "mm/gup: Overload get_user_pages() functions", but I don't think it
> > > makes sense to apply all of that.  I'm attaching a minimal patch
> > > (tested with an arm allnoconfig build) which should ideally be inserted
> > > before mm-replace-get_user_pages-write-force-parameters-with-
> > > gup_flags.patch.
> > > 
> > > Ben.
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Ben Hutchings, Software Developer                ?        Codethink Ltd
> > > https://www.codethink.co.uk/                 Dale House, 35 Dale Street
> > >                                       Manchester, M1 2HF, United Kingdom
> > 
> > >  From 0d0afe933f60f5736c984e9171214aa34b18764c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
> > > Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 23:50:08 +0000
> > > Subject: [PATCH] mm/nommu.c: Switch __get_user_pages_unlocked() to use
> > >   __get_user_pages()
> > > 
> > > Extracted from commit cde70140fed8 "mm/gup: Overload get_user_pages()
> > > functions".  This is needed before picking commit 768ae309a961
> > > "mm: replace get_user_pages() write/force parameters with gup_flags".
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
> > > ---
> > >   mm/nommu.c | 4 ++--
> > >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/nommu.c
> > > index fa1560c218d5..2360546db065 100644
> > > --- a/mm/nommu.c
> > > +++ b/mm/nommu.c
> > > @@ -208,8 +208,8 @@ long __get_user_pages_unlocked(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
> > >   {
> > >   	long ret;
> > >   	down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > > -	ret = get_user_pages(tsk, mm, start, nr_pages, write, force,
> > > -			     pages, NULL);
> > > +	ret = __get_user_pages(tsk, mm, start, nr_pages, gup_flags, pages,
> > > +			       NULL, NULL);
> > >   	up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > >   	return ret;
> > >   }
> > 
> > Thanks for the patch.  I've added it to the queue and pushed out a -rc2
> > with this in it.
> > 
> > Let's see what the builders say :)
> > 
> 
> v4.4.167-89-g9c558d7fe359 seemed to be happy. v4.4.167-89-g50a0280f2f7e
> replaced it and will take a while.

If I read your site right, it passed everything except one qemu test?
Is that normal?

thanks,

greg k-h