Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp3621301imu; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 01:10:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WPRkT2QKEyQW4VtgP1P4nCWVkttClHyXzowVJVJvAdBcbOZaFEWHMuqOS4jgZDwagVzC7r X-Received: by 2002:a62:6cc8:: with SMTP id h191mr16679343pfc.89.1545124226200; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 01:10:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1545124226; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Y2QFx+R9jZd4Hx+1WD0ql3gamolzFTY+854Bb5QU9HEqN4J1FLeeOOWdzj6CF8pKGR HjUzH0+M6idpPTiS7jYVxsms1AZpxC3UZZea5y3UsirExfFDSakR1rdRGq0J7rQDJrEa VP6agr3661/HMYanFfFyk/SLmujbbawL6cqkIHCntgmIF4aKS2k/LE2C1Zor+9GHruLN 3Q2LBITAi1c1UeoFXWu3anfJIMsUdnn2rYMALQyrYItSPtPGsiglzBw+7AKTA4Kc8357 i2W6QRUelw85C2EeHeKU/veEsfKeLwL+wN6tJqGKCT5dU3Mz4QiWPQBIYtZylmxPA9Q5 cfZA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=xch/ClA9qLmo4plzO78iRKkOgWObVQ4UpMtEA7bseW8=; b=FUtEtpdjITcyJSCIUWWGtWgVEVm9PGsbO0rMcnkknQLK9KKmCdpLbRXnUi80D25BFT 9myBjSeLKk96K71j5rtmehjbK8EH133dXwd0mHXKvnusjpCtKRHEztIQgEFkYtviGL80 ldwAIF2cqsaY0ECexhjJ/GN2Qthnon8WyndPOwq2hHoZ9oWfkD9RyjYzH2kb6WZXRxem BXl1V+FLW1c+3R6roT5Dm0Q1HD4iKNCVA+wOdh+nx1aDvazbJQgX9paGtlAEQxZneftw WHtC2Ka/HKkPKHSBlxFsuAxhcKTSjFTspdtph1IRMRC+D/QCBpuX8dfZcwmZXYnXVvCO kD6A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u7si13252285pfu.270.2018.12.18.01.10.10; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 01:10:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726432AbeLRJJM (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 18 Dec 2018 04:09:12 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49396 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726346AbeLRJJM (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Dec 2018 04:09:12 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB914AC17; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 09:09:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 10:09:07 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Heiko Carstens Cc: Andrew Morton , Oscar Salvador , Anshuman Khandual , Stephen Rothwell , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [-next] lots of messages due to "mm, memory_hotplug: be more verbose for memory offline failures" Message-ID: <20181218090907.GD30879@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20181217155922.GC3560@osiris> <20181217160350.GV30879@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20181217163949.GX30879@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20181218075538.GA3590@osiris> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181218075538.GA3590@osiris> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue 18-12-18 08:55:38, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 05:39:49PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Mon 17-12-18 17:03:50, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Mon 17-12-18 16:59:22, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > > Hi Michal, > > > > > > > > with linux-next as of today on s390 I see tons of messages like > > > > > > > > [ 20.536664] page dumped because: has_unmovable_pages > > > > [ 20.536792] page:000003d081ff4080 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:000000008ff88600 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0 > > > > [ 20.536794] flags: 0x3fffe0000010200(slab|head) > > > > [ 20.536795] raw: 03fffe0000010200 0000000000000100 0000000000000200 000000008ff88600 > > > > [ 20.536796] raw: 0000000000000000 0020004100000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000000000000 > > > > [ 20.536797] page dumped because: has_unmovable_pages > > > > [ 20.536814] page:000003d0823b0000 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 > > > > [ 20.536815] flags: 0x7fffe0000000000() > > > > [ 20.536817] raw: 07fffe0000000000 0000000000000100 0000000000000200 0000000000000000 > > > > [ 20.536818] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000000000000 > > > > > > > > bisect points to b323c049a999 ("mm, memory_hotplug: be more verbose for memory offline failures") > > > > which is the first commit with which the messages appear. > > > > > > I would bet this is CMA allocator. How much is tons? Maybe we want a > > > rate limit or the other user is not really interested in them at all? > > Yes, the system in question has a 4NB CMA area. "tons" translates to several hundred. OK, I guess these messages on their own without a wider context are not that helpful. It is still surprising to see slab pages or non-movable pages in the CMA area. The later might be an CMA allocation I guess but slab pages shouldn't be there at all AFAIU. > > In other words, this should silence those messages. > > Yes, with the patch below applied the messages don't appear anymore. OK, I will post an official patch. Even if CMA allocator decides to report failures it can simply add the flag. Thanks! > > diff --git a/include/linux/page-isolation.h b/include/linux/page-isolation.h > > index 4ae347cbc36d..4eb26d278046 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/page-isolation.h > > +++ b/include/linux/page-isolation.h > > @@ -30,8 +30,11 @@ static inline bool is_migrate_isolate(int migratetype) > > } > > #endif > > > > +#define SKIP_HWPOISON 0x1 > > +#define REPORT_FAILURE 0x2 > > + > > bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count, > > - int migratetype, bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages); > > + int migratetype, int flags); > > void set_pageblock_migratetype(struct page *page, int migratetype); > > int move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, > > int migratetype, int *num_movable); > > @@ -44,10 +47,14 @@ int move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, > > * For isolating all pages in the range finally, the caller have to > > * free all pages in the range. test_page_isolated() can be used for > > * test it. > > + * > > + * The following flags are allowed (they can be combined in a bit mask) > > + * SKIP_HWPOISON - ignore hwpoison pages > > + * REPORT_FAILURE - report details about the failure to isolate the range > > */ > > int > > start_isolate_page_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn, > > - unsigned migratetype, bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages); > > + unsigned migratetype, int flags); > > > > /* > > * Changes MIGRATE_ISOLATE to MIGRATE_MOVABLE. > > diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c > > index c82193db4be6..8537429d33a6 100644 > > --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c > > +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c > > @@ -1226,7 +1226,7 @@ static bool is_pageblock_removable_nolock(struct page *page) > > if (!zone_spans_pfn(zone, pfn)) > > return false; > > > > - return !has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, 0, MIGRATE_MOVABLE, true); > > + return !has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, 0, MIGRATE_MOVABLE, SKIP_HWPOISON); > > } > > > > /* Checks if this range of memory is likely to be hot-removable. */ > > @@ -1577,7 +1577,8 @@ static int __ref __offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, > > > > /* set above range as isolated */ > > ret = start_isolate_page_range(start_pfn, end_pfn, > > - MIGRATE_MOVABLE, true); > > + MIGRATE_MOVABLE, > > + SKIP_HWPOISON | REPORT_FAILURE); > > if (ret) { > > mem_hotplug_done(); > > reason = "failure to isolate range"; > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > > index ec2c7916dc2d..ee4043419791 100644 > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > > @@ -7754,8 +7754,7 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename, > > * race condition. So you can't expect this function should be exact. > > */ > > bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count, > > - int migratetype, > > - bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages) > > + int migratetype, int flags) > > { > > unsigned long pfn, iter, found; > > > > @@ -7818,7 +7817,7 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count, > > * The HWPoisoned page may be not in buddy system, and > > * page_count() is not 0. > > */ > > - if (skip_hwpoisoned_pages && PageHWPoison(page)) > > + if ((flags & SKIP_HWPOISON) && PageHWPoison(page)) > > continue; > > > > if (__PageMovable(page)) > > @@ -7845,7 +7844,8 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count, > > return false; > > unmovable: > > WARN_ON_ONCE(zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE); > > - dump_page(pfn_to_page(pfn+iter), "unmovable page"); > > + if (flags & REPORT_FAILURE) > > + dump_page(pfn_to_page(pfn+iter), "unmovable page"); > > return true; > > } > > > > @@ -7972,8 +7972,7 @@ int alloc_contig_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, > > */ > > > > ret = start_isolate_page_range(pfn_max_align_down(start), > > - pfn_max_align_up(end), migratetype, > > - false); > > + pfn_max_align_up(end), migratetype, 0); > > if (ret) > > return ret; > > > > diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c > > index 43e085608846..ce323e56b34d 100644 > > --- a/mm/page_isolation.c > > +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c > > @@ -15,8 +15,7 @@ > > #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS > > #include > > > > -static int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, int migratetype, > > - bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages) > > +static int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, int migratetype, int isol_flags) > > { > > struct zone *zone; > > unsigned long flags, pfn; > > @@ -60,8 +59,7 @@ static int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, int migratetype, > > * FIXME: Now, memory hotplug doesn't call shrink_slab() by itself. > > * We just check MOVABLE pages. > > */ > > - if (!has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, arg.pages_found, migratetype, > > - skip_hwpoisoned_pages)) > > + if (!has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, arg.pages_found, migratetype, flags)) > > ret = 0; > > > > /* > > @@ -185,7 +183,7 @@ __first_valid_page(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages) > > * prevents two threads from simultaneously working on overlapping ranges. > > */ > > int start_isolate_page_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn, > > - unsigned migratetype, bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages) > > + unsigned migratetype, int flags) > > { > > unsigned long pfn; > > unsigned long undo_pfn; > > @@ -199,7 +197,7 @@ int start_isolate_page_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn, > > pfn += pageblock_nr_pages) { > > page = __first_valid_page(pfn, pageblock_nr_pages); > > if (page && > > - set_migratetype_isolate(page, migratetype, skip_hwpoisoned_pages)) { > > + set_migratetype_isolate(page, migratetype, flags)) { > > undo_pfn = pfn; > > goto undo; > > } > > -- > > Michal Hocko > > SUSE Labs > > -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs