Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 18 Dec 2018 15:13:11 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
        nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, serge.ayoun@intel.com,
        shay.katz-zamir@intel.com, haitao.huang@linux.intel.com,
        andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
        kai.svahn@intel.com, mark.shanahan@intel.com, luto@amacapital.net,
        Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
        "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" 
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 18/23] platform/x86: Intel SGX driver
Message-ID: <20181218131311.GB25667@linux.intel.com>
References: <20181116010412.23967-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
 <20181116010412.23967-19-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
 <7d5cde02-4649-546b-0f03-2d6414bb80b5@intel.com>
 <20181217180102.GA12560@linux.intel.com>
 <20181217183613.GD12491@linux.intel.com>
 <20181217184333.GA26920@linux.intel.com>
 <20181217184858.GF12491@linux.intel.com>
 <20181217193322.GA29785@linux.intel.com>
 <20181217202149.GA19053@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181217202149.GA19053@linux.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:21:49PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 09:33:22PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:48:58AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 08:43:33PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:36:13AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > > I'm pretty sure doing mmget() would result in circular dependencies and
> > > > > a zombie enclave.  In the do_exit() case where a task is abruptly killed:
> > > > >  
> > > > >   - __mmput() is never called because the enclave holds a ref
> > > > >   - sgx_encl_release() is never be called because its VMAs hold refs
> > > > >   - sgx_vma_close() is never called because __mmput()->exit_mmap() is
> > > > >     blocked and the process itself is dead, i.e. won't unmap anything.
> > > > 
> > > > Right, it does, you are absolutely right. Tried it and removed the
> > > > commit already.
> > > > 
> > > > Well, what we came up from your suggestion i.e. setting mm to NULL
> > > > and checking that is very subtle change and does not have any such
> > > > circular dependencies. We'll go with that.
> > > 
> > > We can't set mm to NULL as we need it to unregister the notifier, and
> > > I'm fairly certain attempting to unregister in the release callback
> > > will deadlock.
> > 
> > Noticed that too. mmu_notifier_unregister() requires a valid mm.
> 
> Both branches updated...

I'm not still seeing why you would want to call sgx_free_page() from
sgx_invalidate(). Kind of resistant to adding extra logging just for
checking for programming errors. What I would do if I had to debug
there a leak would be simply put kretprobe on __sgx_free_page().

/Jarkko