Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266484AbUAWAZ7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2004 19:25:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266492AbUAWAZ6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2004 19:25:58 -0500 Received: from are.twiddle.net ([64.81.246.98]:28056 "EHLO are.twiddle.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266484AbUAWAZ5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2004 19:25:57 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 16:25:55 -0800 From: Richard Henderson To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.6.1-mm5 versus gcc 3.5 snapshot Message-ID: <20040123002555.GA22136@twiddle.net> Mail-Followup-To: Linus Torvalds , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Kernel Mailing List References: <200401212236.i0LMaNuh020491@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20040122060253.GA18719@twiddle.net> <20040122233016.GA21967@twiddle.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 570 Lines: 20 On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 03:39:44PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Logical or not, "+" is not how reload works; this must be split to use "0". > > Why don't you split it to do "m" instead? Um, duh. That I can do. > So why break it? We didn't break anything, or even change the code involved. Just added a warning. r~ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/