Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265200AbUAWCAb (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:00:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265215AbUAWCAb (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:00:31 -0500 Received: from ns1.s2io.com ([216.209.86.101]:17287 "EHLO ns1.s2io.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265200AbUAWCA2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:00:28 -0500 From: "Leonid Grossman" To: "'Linux Kernel'" Cc: "'ravinandan arakali'" Subject: pci_alloc_consistent() Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 17:59:47 -0800 Message-ID: <000101c3e154$949dd520$7310100a@S2IOtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-reply-to: <20040122234803.GC18316@widomaker.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Spam-Score: -106.2 X-Spam-Outlook-Score: () X-Spam-Features: BAYES_01,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,USER_IN_WHITELIST Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2349 Lines: 73 Are there any known issues with pci_alloc_consistent() allocating more than 1MB? One of our developers seems to recall a thread but we can't find it... We are using pci_alloc_consistent() in our 10GbE driver, to allocate memory for DMA transfers between host and device. If we allocate under 1MB, everything works fine. When the allocation is more than 1 MB, allocation call does not return any failure but some data corruption seems to take place beyond the 1 MB space. Is this a known problem? The system is 2-way Itanium, running 2.4.21 kernel. Thanks in advance, Leonid > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of > Charles Shannon Hendrix > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 3:48 PM > To: Linux Kernel > Subject: Re: Nvidia drivers and 2.6.x kernel > > > Thu, 22 Jan 2004 @ 12:12 +0000, Kieran said: > > > How strange. I run slack 9.1 and 2.6.1, just grabbed the 4496 > > pre-patched file from http://www.sh.nu/download/nvidia/ and > installed it > > as I would on 2.4. Works a charm. > > How's the performance? > > I have found the 4496 and 5328 drivers lowered my performance. > > 5328 is supposed to be faster mip-mapping and faster when > running with vertical blank sync, but I didn't see it myself. > It also caused quite a few sound artifacts from my Live! sound card. > > Anyone done a driver-by-driver benchmark? > > I got tired of it, but here's the performance order on my > system from fastest to slowest: > > 4620 > 3xxx (last stable 3xxx driver) > 4496 > 5328 > > Mostly what I look for are not benchmark numbers, but notable > hesitation in programs and interactive response, and side > effects like bad sound artifacts. > > > > > -- > UNIX/Perl/C/Pizza____________________s h a n n o n@wido !SPAM > maker.com > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-kernel" in the body of a message to > majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/