Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261965AbUAWNzP (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2004 08:55:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266559AbUAWNzP (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2004 08:55:15 -0500 Received: from delerium.codemonkey.org.uk ([81.187.208.145]:16297 "EHLO delerium.codemonkey.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261965AbUAWNzJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2004 08:55:09 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:53:44 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: John Levon Cc: Linux Kernel list Subject: Re: logic error in radeonfb. Message-ID: <20040123135343.GI9327@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , John Levon , Linux Kernel list References: <1074840394.949.200.camel@gaston> <20040123065410.GF9327@redhat.com> <20040123112444.GB81582@compsoc.man.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040123112444.GB81582@compsoc.man.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2120 Lines: 50 On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 11:24:44AM +0000, John Levon wrote: > > Back then someone came up with a cool one-liner that grepped for > > suspicious if's with !'s, it seems no-one ever did the same for 2.6, > > as there were a few others (see seperate mails for patches). > > Actually I did make a one-liner for 2.6, and found rather a lot (15 or > so if I remember correctly). I also went as far as hacking up something > in gcc, but it was too flaky to go in and I haven't got round to fixing > it up yet. > > Some of them were right under our noses for ages: > http://linus.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/user=levon/patch@1.889.272.4?nav=!-|index.html|stats|!+|index.html|ChangeSet|cset@1.889.272.4 > If you like I can see if I can dig up the gcc patch or the one-liner. Yep, that's where I got the idea for this (seems no-one did the same for the 2.6 tree). Here's the one-liner.. find ${1:-.} -name "*.c" -type f | xargs grep -En '![a-zA-Z0-9_ ]+(\|[^|]|\&[^&])|([^|]\||[^&]\&) *!' | grep -v SCCS As well as the misplaced brackets, it also catches if (foo & bar) where && was probably intended (ditto | instead of ||). It does miss some cases though. Whereas this.. find ${1:-.} -name "*.c" -type f | xargs grep -En 'if[\ ]\(' | grep -v SCCS | grep \)[\ ]\[\|\&][\ ] turns up a few more, but also a lot more false positives. And if you think the number of bugs it turned up in the kernel is unfunny, you should see the results when you run it on a source tree of an unpacked distro. It's Un-be-lievable how common this problem is. It's not every week you get to do patches to ~80 projects in 3 days 8-) I tried coming up with some regexps for other 'stupid errors', things like if (foo); bar or the likes, I got 1-2 real hits out of zillions of lines of code as opposed to the few dozen misplaced brackets and '|' instead of '||' Fun. Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/