Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Wed, 19 Dec 2018 19:40:01 +0100
From:   Maarten Brock <m.brock@vanmierlo.com>
To:     Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@xilinx.com>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] serial: uartps: Driver updates
In-Reply-To: <cover.1545135519.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com>
References: <cover.1545135519.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Message-ID: <06bcd18cb2e0e81d3051ef6305139d40@vanmierlo.com>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.3
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello Michal,

On 2018-12-18 13:18, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am sending 4 patches in series to fix some issues we found.
> Patches were sent separately but I have been asked to send them in
> serial that's why I am also adding cover letter to explain this v2
> version.
> 
> Thanks,
> Michal

I'm wondering why, when reading the linux-serial mailing list, I can 
only see this cover letter.
Are you perhaps using a different To/Cc for the actual patches? And if 
so, is that on purpose?

Kind regards,
Maarten