Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266633AbUAWSeI (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:34:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266640AbUAWSeI (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:34:08 -0500 Received: from mhub-c5.tc.umn.edu ([160.94.128.35]:701 "EHLO mhub-c5.tc.umn.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266633AbUAWSeE (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:34:04 -0500 Subject: Re: gcc 2.95.3 From: Matthew Reppert To: Karel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kulhav=FD?= Cc: Daniel Andersen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20040123163008.B1237@beton.cybernet.src> References: <20040123145048.B1082@beton.cybernet.src> <20040123100035.73bee41f.jeremy@kerneltrap.org> <20040123151340.B1130@beton.cybernet.src> <001b01c3e1ca$26101f20$1e00000a@black> <20040123163008.B1237@beton.cybernet.src> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-oZT+CjTB4j2TfWdHJ1fj" Message-Id: <1074882836.20723.4.camel@minerva> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:33:56 -0600 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1668 Lines: 46 --=-oZT+CjTB4j2TfWdHJ1fj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 10:30, Karel Kulhav=C3=BD wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 05:01:23PM +0100, Daniel Andersen wrote: > > > I read here "make sure you have gcc 2.95.3 available" - does it mean > > > my gcc-3.2.3 or gcc-3.2.2 is not suitable for kernel compiling? > >=20 > > Please have a look at http://developer.osdl.org/cherry/compile/ >=20 > What if the kernel compiles cleanly but the generated code is invalid? > Or is gcc-3.2.2 BugFree(TM) (BugFree as in BugFree speech, not as > in BugFree beer)? Many people have been using gcc-3.2 or later to build kernels, and I haven't really heard of any problems with this, at least on i386. I personally have used 3.2.2 and 3.3.2 (well, with Debian's patches) and haven't had any weirdness with 2.6 or 2.4. ISTR there being arches that need 3.x to compile, but I could be mistaken. 2.95.3 is definitely the *oldest* compiler you'd want to use, and pretty much skip between that and 3.2. Matt --=-oZT+CjTB4j2TfWdHJ1fj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAEWkTA9ZcCXfrOTMRAr3XAJ0aE/E36F8se5sVEf65gW8jCm62JwCfXjdf KRgk3S+nVfv6GSD15eCdsHI= =6N4q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-oZT+CjTB4j2TfWdHJ1fj-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/