Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266669AbUAWTyf (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2004 14:54:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266670AbUAWTyf (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2004 14:54:35 -0500 Received: from twilight.ucw.cz ([81.30.235.3]:56205 "EHLO midnight.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266669AbUAWTyd (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2004 14:54:33 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:54:39 +0100 From: Vojtech Pavlik To: john stultz Cc: Andrew Morton , lkml , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: keyboard and USB problems (Re: 2.6.2-rc1-mm2) Message-ID: <20040123195439.GA7878@ucw.cz> References: <20040123013740.58a6c1f9.akpm@osdl.org> <20040123160152.GA18073@ss1000.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20040123161946.GA6934@ucw.cz> <1074886056.12447.36.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1074886056.12447.36.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1731 Lines: 39 On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 11:27:41AM -0800, john stultz wrote: > On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 08:19, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 05:01:52PM +0100, Rudo Thomas wrote: > > > BogoMIPS is figured out to be 8.19 (this was already reported by another user), > > > > ... this the root cause of the following problems. > > > > > and i8042.c complaints with this: > > > i8042.c: Can't write CTR while closing AUX. > > > > ... bogomips is used in udelay() and that's used for waiting. If > > bogomips is measured lower than real, the wait takes shorter and the > > hardware doesn't do what it should in that short time. > > Well, loops_per_jiffy is actually being measured correctly as we're > using the acpi pm timesource to time udelay(). However there is a loss > of resolution using the slower time source, so udelay(1) might take > longer then 1 us. Longer udelay shouldn't cause trouble. Shorter one definitely would. > If that is going to cause problems, then we'll need to pull out the > use-pmtmr-for-delay_pmtmr patch. I guess our only option is then to use > the TSC for delay_pmtrm() (as a loop based delay fails in other cases). > I'll write that up and send it your way, Andrew. I've seen the PM timer breaking the mouse operation rather badly in the past, the lost-sync check was triggering for many people when the PM timer was used. This implies time inacurracy in the range of 0.5 seconds. Could that happen somehow? -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs, SuSE CR - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/