Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 44/72] bpf: Fix verifier log string check for bad alignment.
Date:   Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:18:43 +0100
Message-Id: <20181220085924.084258036@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20181220085922.332225035@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20181220085922.332225035@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit c01ac66b38660f2b507ccd0b75d28e3002d56fbb ]

The message got changed a lot time ago.

This was responsible for 36 test case failures on sparc64.

Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 041dbbb30ff0..a0591d06c61b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -8070,7 +8070,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
 
 	reject_from_alignment = fd_prog < 0 &&
 				(test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) &&
-				strstr(bpf_vlog, "Unknown alignment.");
+				strstr(bpf_vlog, "misaligned");
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
 	if (reject_from_alignment) {
 		printf("FAIL\nFailed due to alignment despite having efficient unaligned access: '%s'!\n",
-- 
2.19.1