Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 21 Dec 2018 15:55:13 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
        Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 23/24] string.h: Add strncmp_prefix() helper
 macro
Message-ID: <20181221155513.11450ca6@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjtkvFUuRNZU67KccuUKYHw=pYoDMQJ_9OVDFxOwmK9zQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20181221175618.968519903@goodmis.org>
        <20181221175659.208858193@goodmis.org>
        <CAHk-=wg_sR-UEC1ggmkZpypOUYanL5CMX4R7ceuaV4QMf5jBtg@mail.gmail.com>
        <20181221144054.20bdeb33@gandalf.local.home>
        <CAHk-=wgSvRhj6KNRdn9gbK9RJVAswdtKSNjAxdf9O9vn04T5XQ@mail.gmail.com>
        <20181221153526.5e6055ca@gandalf.local.home>
        <CAHk-=wjtkvFUuRNZU67KccuUKYHw=pYoDMQJ_9OVDFxOwmK9zQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 12:41:17 -0800
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> Parentheses....

?

-- Steve

> 
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018, 12:35 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 12:01:48 -0800
> > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 11:40 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > OK, what about if we just use strlen() and say that this macro is not
> > > > safe for parameters with side effects.
> > >
> > > I think gcc follows simple assignments just fine, and does the
> > > optimized strlen() for them too.
> > >
> > > So why not just do
> > >
> > >    #define have_prefix(str,prefix) ({ \
> > >         const char *__pfx = prefix; \
> > >         size_t __pfxlen = strlen(__pfx); \
> > >         strncmp(str, __pfx, __pfxlen) ? 0 : __pfxlen); })
> > >
> > > and be done with it safely?
> > >
> > > The above is ENTIRELY untested.
> > >
> >
> > At first I thought this would have issues, but with a slight change...
> >
> > #define have_prefix(str, prefix) ({ \
> >         const char *__pfx = (const char *)prefix; \
> >
> >
> > And the rest the same, it appears to work.
> >
> > Need the cast because if for some reason someone passed in something
> > like "const unsigned char" then it wouldn't work. But that's just a nit.
> >
> > So something like this then?
> >
> > -- Steve
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/string.h b/include/linux/string.h
> > index 27d0482e5e05..4586fee60194 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/string.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/string.h
> > @@ -14,6 +14,28 @@ extern void *memdup_user(const void __user *, size_t);
> >  extern void *vmemdup_user(const void __user *, size_t);
> >  extern void *memdup_user_nul(const void __user *, size_t);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * have_prefix - Test if a string has a given prefix
> > + * @str: The string to test
> > + * @prefix: The string to see if @str starts with
> > + *
> > + * A common way to test a prefix of a string is to do:
> > + *  strncmp(str, prefix, sizeof(prefix) - 1)
> > + *
> > + * But this can lead to bugs due to typos, or if prefix is a pointer
> > + * and not a constant. Instead use has_prefix().
> > + *
> > + * Returns: 0 if @str does not start with @prefix
> > +         strlen(@prefix) if @str does start with @prefix
> > + */
> > +#define has_prefix(str, prefix)
> >       \
> > +       ({                                                              \
> > +               const char *____prefix____ = (const char *)(prefix);    \
> > +               int ____len____ = strlen(____prefix____);               \
> > +               strncmp(str, ____prefix____, ____len____) == 0 ?        \
> > +                       ____len____ : 0;                                \
> > +       })
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Include machine specific inline routines
> >   */
> >