Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <e62d4c3a-b89b-2380-7b39-66733b389145@gmail.com>
 <CAEJqkggwbNP3Q+7AWr4i64CvAdCp15jVLOtUsnMo6rLk3ExTkA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wjd2VJDM+RXwg30MpW45F5EHZtLErzxQzYxi4+Dnm3sjw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPP7u0Vo6gB86S-hZcOW9Rmki8oKHd=Lyx3x-N9gjPC4JP_YxQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wg-6jYZ=bJWdyBR=n8QOfwHTZZdzSUUPgFW+NGCV-pe2g@mail.gmail.com> <CAPP7u0UhPyC=eewx4dYu+AU5tK_URE8_5PW9cNkK6Ppp7vkqHg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPP7u0UhPyC=eewx4dYu+AU5tK_URE8_5PW9cNkK6Ppp7vkqHg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Sat, 22 Dec 2018 15:28:23 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg8Qrh4nvFbWttz6zPMeRKO2Twv57vZfGaQ6odsjYFEnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BREAKAGE] Since 4.18, kernel sets SB_I_NODEV implicitly on
 userns mounts, breaking systemd-nspawn
To:     christian.brauner@canonical.com
Cc:     nix.or.die@gmail.com, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        ellierevves@gmail.com,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, seth.forshee@canonical.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 3:07 PM Christian Brauner
<christian.brauner@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> However, for this case should I resend the revert?

Since I was pointed at the original email thread, I just picked it up
from there directly. It still applied cleanly, nothing had changed in
that area.

                Linus