Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262164AbUAXVYV (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:24:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262360AbUAXVYV (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:24:21 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:41147 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262164AbUAXVYS (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:24:18 -0500 Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:14:45 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20040124.131445.48521788.davem@redhat.com> To: jgarzik@pobox.com Cc: grundler@parisc-linux.org, jgarzik@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.1 tg3 DMA engine test failure From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <4012E071.2080704@pobox.com> References: <20040124073032.GA7265@colo.lackof.org> <20040123.233241.59493446.davem@redhat.com> <4012E071.2080704@pobox.com> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 741 Lines: 19 From: Jeff Garzik Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:15:29 -0500 There were two separate components to Grant's patch (hint ggg... split up your patches). What do you think about GRC-resets-sub-components part? That appears valid (and probably wise) to me, but correct me if I'm wrong... I know, I tried to give the impression that I was fine with Grant's patch besides the ALL_BE bit part. I'll take care of further reviewing and merging this around Jeff. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/