Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
To:     m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de, davem@davemloft.net
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: arcnet: Fix a possible concurrency use-after-free bug in arcnet_reply_tasklet()
Date:   Wed, 26 Dec 2018 22:22:26 +0800
Message-Id: <20181226142226.13039-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

In drivers/net/arcnet/arcnet.c, the functions arcnet_reply_tasklet() and
arcnet_send_packet() may be concurrently executed.

arcnet_reply_tasklet()
  line 430: dev_kfree_skb(lp->outgoing.skb);

arcnet_send_packet()
  line 682: spin_lock_irqsave();
  line 690: lp->outgoing.skb = skb;
  line 691: proto->prepare_tx(..., skb->len, ...)

Thus, a possible concurrency use-after-free bugs may occur.

To fix this bug, the calls to spin_lock_irqsave() and
spin_unlock_irqrestore() are added in arcnet_reply_tasklet() to protect
dev_kfree_skb(lp->outgoing.skb).

Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/arcnet/arcnet.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/arcnet/arcnet.c b/drivers/net/arcnet/arcnet.c
index 8459115d9d4e..c5e943d01d66 100644
--- a/drivers/net/arcnet/arcnet.c
+++ b/drivers/net/arcnet/arcnet.c
@@ -426,10 +426,14 @@ static void arcnet_reply_tasklet(unsigned long data)
 	serr->ee.ee_data = skb_shinfo(skb)->tskey;
 	serr->ee.ee_info = lp->reply_status;
 
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&lp->lock, flags);
+
 	/* finally erasing outgoing skb */
 	dev_kfree_skb(lp->outgoing.skb);
 	lp->outgoing.skb = NULL;
 
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lp->lock, flags);
+
 	ackskb->dev = lp->dev;
 
 	ret = sock_queue_err_skb(sk, ackskb);
-- 
2.17.0