Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263598AbUAYCDn (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:03:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263606AbUAYCDn (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:03:43 -0500 Received: from pcp03435692pcs.olathe01.ks.comcast.net ([68.86.102.188]:17318 "EHLO mail.2thebatcave.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263598AbUAYCDl (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:03:41 -0500 Message-ID: <57099.192.168.1.12.1074996225.squirrel@mail.2thebatcave.com> Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 20:03:45 -0600 (CST) Subject: acpi - forcing only button event & powerdown on? From: "Nick Bartos" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1642 Lines: 34 I have a little linux distro I made that I use for a fair amount of routers/servers. They use several different motherboards, and it seems to me that in every recent release, the acpi in the kernel fixes support for one board while breaking another. I have tried forcing acpi on before, but I really don't like to do that as I am thinking it would have side effects (one of the boards is on a blacklist for acpi=ht, and when I do acpi=force it says that I am overriding acpi=ht). Really all I use on all of these systems is the acpi button event (for a nice way to cleanly shutdown a headless router/server by tapping the power button), and the acpi powerdown feature. I would think these two features are simple enough that forcing them on wouldn't cause any problems like system instability, even if there were hardware issues with them (but then I really don't know anything about acpi...). Is there a way to force acpi on, but only for the couple of things I need (disabling the rest if it is a good idea), so I don't get into trouble later? I don't care too much for the idea of making a distro where I am bypassing kernel autodection on things (as it is most likely done a certain way for a reason, and I am no kernel developer), but I would like to be assured that when I upgrade these machines, the two functions I use will continue to work. Am I asking too much or is this doable? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/