Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4085fc648ff5086bd6e6237d74d2a11e945a617b.camel@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4085fc648ff5086bd6e6237d74d2a11e945a617b.camel@gmail.com>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Dec 2018 13:48:29 +0100
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaDT9xZe6r3pJvYqubrvHh4+PkV8D38yYMEbv8fhdHMKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Interrupt storm from pinctrl-amd on Acer AN515-42
To:     Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@gmail.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Nehal Shah <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com>,
        Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>,
        Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com>,
        Nitesh Kumar Agrawal <Nitesh-kumar.Agrawal@amd.com>,
        "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 12:02 AM Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@gmail.com> wrote:

> Digging a little deeper it seems the touchpad interrupt is active on
> boot and since it's configured as "level" and no touchpad driver is
> available yet there does not seem to be any way to clear it.

I think these are called "spurious interrupts".

> I don't know how this should be handled, booting with an active enabled but
> unclearable interrupt seems like a platform bug to me. There is even an
> option to set touchpad to "basic" which does some sort of ps2 emulation
> but the IRQ issue still happens!
>
> One workaround is to explicitly disable the interrupt from the handler
> if no mapping is found; this will keep it disabled until
> amd_gpio_irq_set_type is called later.

I don't know how x86 and ACPI systems usually deal with this stuff
so I'm kind of lost. On the embedded systems that I develop on,
I would just disable all interrupts on probe() (usually writing 0x0 in
some interrupt enable register) and then they will get enabled
once consumers need them.

But I have come to understand that maybe ACPI systems are
not so happy about drivers doing things like that?

Yours,
Linus Walleij