Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:54:54 -0800
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To:     Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc:     Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
        Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
        Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>, hpa@zytor.com,
        lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, rminnich@sandia.gov,
        v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] d_off field in struct dirent and 32-on-64 emulation
Message-ID: <20181229015453.GA6310@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <87bm56vqg4.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
 <CAFEAcA92m4vhzjJ+B=mP_o6Wfhx1XSKo3uWxah3osh=u5UXFuw@mail.gmail.com>
 <9C6A7D45-CF53-4C61-B5DD-12CA0D419972@dilger.ca>
 <CAFEAcA9W+JK7_TrtTnL1P2ES1knNPJX9wcUvhfLwxLq9augq1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <1EF1B31A-83D8-4642-BEBF-F56E45485223@dilger.ca>
 <CAFEAcA8Yq=CEyAUer1TcaSzuzcdNi3OUi4c67B6e+OkhmcKvbg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8Yq=CEyAUer1TcaSzuzcdNi3OUi4c67B6e+OkhmcKvbg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 12:12:27AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 at 23:16, Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> wrot
> > On Dec 28, 2018, at 4:18 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > The problem is that there is no 32-bit API in some cases
> > > (unless I have misunderstood the kernel code) -- not all
> > > host architectures implement compat syscalls or allow them
> > > to be called from 64-bit processes or implement all the older
> > > syscall variants that had smaller offets. If there was a guaranteed
> > > "this syscall always exists and always gives me 32-bit offsets"
> > > we could use it.
> >
> > The "32bitapi" mount option would use 32-bit hash for seekdir
> > and telldir, regardless of what kernel API was used.  That would
> > just set the FMODE_32BITHASH flag in the file->f_mode for all files.
> 
> A mount option wouldn't be much use to QEMU -- we can't tell
> our users how to mount their filesystems, which they're
> often doing lots of other things with besides running QEMU.
> (Otherwise we could just tell them "don't use ext4", which
> would also solve the problem :-)) We need something we can
> use at the individual-syscall level.

Could you use a prctl to set whether you were running in 32 or 64 bit
mode?  Or do you change which kind of task you're emulating too often
to make this a good idea?