Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 28 Dec 2018 21:31:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <20181228.213103.793343860286706296.davem@davemloft.net>
To:     baijiaju1990@gmail.com
Cc:     m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: arcnet: Fix a possible concurrency
 use-after-free bug in arcnet_reply_tasklet()
From:   David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20181227020142.18190-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
References: <20181227020142.18190-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 10:01:42 +0800

> @@ -401,6 +401,7 @@ static void arcnet_reply_tasklet(unsigned long data)
>  	struct sock_exterr_skb *serr;
>  	struct sock *sk;
>  	int ret;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	local_irq_disable();
>  	skb = lp->outgoing.skb;
> @@ -426,10 +427,14 @@ static void arcnet_reply_tasklet(unsigned long data)
>  	serr->ee.ee_data = skb_shinfo(skb)->tskey;
>  	serr->ee.ee_info = lp->reply_status;
>  
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&lp->lock, flags);
> +
>  	/* finally erasing outgoing skb */
>  	dev_kfree_skb(lp->outgoing.skb);
>  	lp->outgoing.skb = NULL;
>  
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lp->lock, flags);
> +
>  	ackskb->dev = lp->dev;
>  
>  	ret = sock_queue_err_skb(sk, ackskb);

This is not the correct fix.

You need to instead replace the existing local_irq_*() calls in the
function with the spinlock stuff.