Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265238AbUAYTuf (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jan 2004 14:50:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265246AbUAYTu1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jan 2004 14:50:27 -0500 Received: from modemcable178.89-70-69.mc.videotron.ca ([69.70.89.178]:62338 "EHLO montezuma.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265238AbUAYTuS (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jan 2004 14:50:18 -0500 Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:28:32 -0500 (EST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo To: Huw Rogers cc: Linux Kernel , linux-laptop@mobilix.org Subject: Re: 2.6.2-rc1 / ACPI sleep / irqbalance / kirqd / pentium 4 HT problems on Uniwill N258SA0 In-Reply-To: <20040124233749.5637.COUNT0@localnet.com> Message-ID: References: <20040124233749.5637.COUNT0@localnet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 832 Lines: 16 On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, Huw Rogers wrote: > irqbalance just locks up the machine totally, hard power-off needed, no > traces in the logs. Probably some issue (race?) with it writing to > /proc/irq/X/smp_affinity. And how is irqbalance supposed to play with > kirqd anyway? Grepping this list and others doesn't give any kind of an > answer. But disabling it gives all interrupts to cpu0 (looking at > /proc/interrupts). kirqd apparently only balances between CPU packages, > not between HT siblings (info gleaned from this list). Does this happen with the 'noirqbalance' kernel parameter? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/