Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4880b31d0d32c38a675048be903814a062907125.camel@intel.com>
 <CAHk-=wgMfBXdiaeAxYrdTq9VoaVgN26T8MU7+3EnvJP_e0byuw@mail.gmail.com> <20181229153608.GA21173@pure.paranoia.local>
In-Reply-To: <20181229153608.GA21173@pure.paranoia.local>
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 29 Dec 2018 10:04:59 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4h_J6fmkrf2rjwcDjfZitmgAmxn11KBk2YeVNgH3ma9PA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] libnvdimm for 4.21
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 7:36 AM Konstantin Ryabitsev
<konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 09:57:28PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Hmm.
> >
> > This pull request doesn't seem to have gotten an automatic pr-tracker
> > reply, even though I pulled it, and even though it was cc'd to lkml.
> >
> > Konstantin, any idea why the automation didn't trigger? I'm not seeing
> > anything all that odd about it.
>
> As you've noticed, it's not on lore, and it's also not on any other LKML
> archive out there (I've checked lkml.org, lkml.iu.edu, marc.info). So,
> I'm not sure precisely what happened, but it would appear that despite
> the CC in the headers, the mail never actually passed vger.
>
> > Does lkml hate Dan?

I suspect this is the case, or more specifically this is likely one of
those times where vger needed to put the Intel mail servers in a
time-out for bouncing too many mails.