Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265359AbUAYXaO (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:30:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265363AbUAYXaN (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:30:13 -0500 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.172.17]:56251 "EHLO nevyn.them.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265359AbUAYXaD (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:30:03 -0500 Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:30:00 -0500 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Userland headers available Message-ID: <20040125233000.GA3319@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200401231907.17802.mmazur@kernel.pl> <20040123184755.GA2138@nevyn.them.org> <401172D8.8040507@nortelnetworks.com> <4011788D.3070606@nortelnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1671 Lines: 42 On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 01:38:06AM +0000, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Followup to: <4011788D.3070606@nortelnetworks.com> > By author: Chris Friesen > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > > Friesen, Christopher [CAR:7Q28:EXCH] wrote: > > > > > The obvious way is to have the kernel headers include the userland > > > headers, then everything below that be wrapped in "#ifdef __KERNEL__". > > > Userland then includes the normal kernel headers, but only gets the > > > userland-safe ones. > > > > I just realized this wasn't clear. I envision a new set of headers in > > the kernel that are clean to export to userland. The current headers > > then include the appropriate userland-clean ones, and everything below > > that is kernel only. > > > > This lets the kernel maintain the userland-clean headers explicitly, and > > we don't have the work of cleaning them up for glibc. > > > > We've referred to this for quite a while as the "ABI header project"; > it's been targetted for 2.7, since it missed the 2.6 freeze. > > We have set up a mailing list at: > > http://zytor.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxabi > > The goal is to get a formal exportable version of the kernel ABI that > user-space libraries can use. Are the list archives broken, or has there never been traffic on this list? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/