Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp12124774imu; Tue, 1 Jan 2019 15:08:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4LPm+aWPuwNTiiBP9pLvUyTs+Fp8JJbkVG0aVTu0vDFzeCiC48hq9T1jDGiz71tI7CLzbM X-Received: by 2002:a63:3d49:: with SMTP id k70mr11757356pga.191.1546384110723; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 15:08:30 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1546384110; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ylgAUwWr+UtUJ//YzKvA7Wvl3HpFA16bpNjRdkEqa40YpUBggcpqXnRi+ylfPjlSq5 O2u7ZBgRjVYXMftMq5IXlDTEGUyDS8n9tQmLHHywrk8+clmpTo3R8YpofoujysqolqGn /Cukzf/v09gltT1GcuAGwHRvN1ApGGL08+GJnlBN5oP2xLM9RBWvrwFS+Nhnsz0sqXL1 LMLUpfZHg6IonP0kxopiUECJqlIoYteXUNd69IHFzMLkcPaAVidg3LNyp4SEJTSibyMK etd6ofKsUB8M4v0Zlo2mFcEZC4B6QEmR/GXbkdgyHzG0xrFYNq+3xpQbcDQDbY6Hh8de l5sQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=o1smFcJyY+sRLjSvnuWeB9fT9Kf3K1Xevdi2qg89Cpg=; b=ikUiEPc0k5WNU4eXHNuKLHYLGKoJ5G5aCNYVTAQFuGe7CTDTvSif8EfhAUqlnO0bzh XkuG+RCpXHbmEeWjTmCH5rmafSR1jRURz4bRUyM39EaBXobtoMk33z/V4AH18gCehMqd 7+hTcqROv1aQLTG5wmoL/uFVCQ9Wi5Ys7klXFocfuZCU8swy3oXHTubYhG27MWioWNPc hCpTvCSZPvijx5oZ4+h89U1XeZpwk+LufBvG5jfG1H90H4EkoQo5G6CHGo7DnfflJOQe wfnhdDrybogFqhIV6K01QpfHmsObHw1bSKehfYS2Fa1Iw4Mv9WOGMAiAm9CEDaS1isrF mHzQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=google header.b=eRvmYGLH; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z128si48836621pgb.372.2019.01.01.15.08.04; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 15:08:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=google header.b=eRvmYGLH; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727606AbfAAVJC (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 1 Jan 2019 16:09:02 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f195.google.com ([209.85.208.195]:40437 "EHLO mail-lj1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725958AbfAAVJB (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jan 2019 16:09:01 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f195.google.com with SMTP id n18-v6so25639678lji.7 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 13:09:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=o1smFcJyY+sRLjSvnuWeB9fT9Kf3K1Xevdi2qg89Cpg=; b=eRvmYGLHGAKsvul25tTOCU2Zg0PuKiLwpkQJ9JJhJfTpTsM8Gw8Wp0XspIw5Q9+I+p BJnuYwuWHb3R8/yZ73WCBYSJha0aJUMzvda0jIllRPf0kfzE+QwBaO9hYSBqe/kP47Ty SZAEtqeqM0Ok1u1XV9lbsnnK9w++pIvq3L3oc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=o1smFcJyY+sRLjSvnuWeB9fT9Kf3K1Xevdi2qg89Cpg=; b=nkl/+K6QBymJguow5UANPRIHcswMFkuN3wWuMmb7jfCgCjfWUOj/z4qQ7xq+krjufi enO9UCht4XCwjsVr0145ES+fXkLXgQM7RUokmsT05D09Av/Dsca1gJjy3OsLv4B706wU SRqYVhqOjcinJXGcVNHBg633fkUcVEH3uv3vXxYVdQtW+gCq5KZrdUHrka5fSAreD153 cHXUykTuv/oxKHStLCZY5U+4EFRYTR6dOnukvfTG6MOELjBktw4y9M+eyphWQBMi5CwK N8E+A3aEq6mAhjdLizV9gtSfbKj9KEbg8oY47/XgreGa7viakEC1FmqaQvsfD6ApLZ+0 TsTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcXdFV45NG051jeI692zEy4flkoTs6M0LKCjcv3IPIcxIXjOtzO nCaKO+upwyLrZbJVbPAOZJXKTAlK8dE= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:20c3:: with SMTP id g64-v6mr25835140lji.101.1546376939235; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 13:08:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lj1-f171.google.com (mail-lj1-f171.google.com. [209.85.208.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x21sm9916136lfe.6.2019.01.01.13.08.57 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Jan 2019 13:08:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-f171.google.com with SMTP id v15-v6so25634208ljh.13 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 13:08:57 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a2e:95c6:: with SMTP id y6-v6mr2630250ljh.59.1546376937148; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 13:08:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181128232019.GC131170@gmail.com> <20181217181244.220052-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <1545076260.2878.15.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20181231224530.GA12425@zzz.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20181231224530.GA12425@zzz.localdomain> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2019 13:08:41 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] KEYS: fix parsing invalid pkey info string To: Eric Biggers Cc: David Howells , James Bottomley , James Morris , Mimi Zohar , Jarkko Sakkinen , Peter Huewe , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, Linux List Kernel Mailing , syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 2:45 PM Eric Biggers wrote: > > KEYCTL_PKEY_QUERY is still failing basic fuzzing even after Linus' fix that > changed Opt_err from -1 to 0. The crash is still in keyctl_pkey_params_parse(): > > token = match_token(p, param_keys, args); > if (__test_and_set_bit(token, &token_mask)) > return -EINVAL; > q = args[0].from; > if (!q[0]) > return -EINVAL; > > Now it crashes on '!q[0]' because 'args[0].from' is uninitialized when > token == Opt_err. args[0] is only initialized when the parsed token had a > pattern that set it. Argh., how embarrassing. And it turns out that James' suggestion to initialize token_mask would actually have fixed that, for subtle reasons (but subtle was what I didn't want). I detest that match_token() interface, but this key code then mis-uses it in ways it wasn't even meant for, and tries to "share" error paths that aren't actually common. I'll take your original patch, which I clearly should have done originally. Thanks, and sorry for the wasted time, Linus