Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "staging:r8188eu: use lib80211 CCMP decrypt"
To:     Ivan Safonov <insafonov@gmail.com>,
        Michael Straube <straube.linux@gmail.com>,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc:     devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20181230183918.3888-1-straube.linux@gmail.com>
 <efbc3a4a-ce31-8785-73c0-3d89edc66977@lwfinger.net>
 <4dd17d38-8c4d-b5db-1091-edba0d95cadf@gmail.com>
From:   Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Message-ID: <99d2e692-6a6b-b880-c8c2-99944f8a5f52@lwfinger.net>
Date:   Tue, 1 Jan 2019 15:38:23 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.3.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4dd17d38-8c4d-b5db-1091-edba0d95cadf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 1/1/19 3:02 AM, Ivan Safonov wrote:
> I suggested a patch for loading modules from interruptible mode, but this patch 
> remained unclaimed ( 
> http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/driverdev-devel/2018-August/124851.html 
> ).
> 
> For some reason I thought that this patch had been removed and did not track the 
> fate of this code ( 
> http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/driverdev-devel/2018-August/124573.html 
> ).

That patch was quite extensive, but had only a minimal commit message. I'm 
surprised that it did not get a bad review, but I can see why it was ignored.

Where did you submit that patch? It certainly was never in my mailbox.

Larry