Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:15:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:15:45 -0500 Received: from umail.unify.com ([204.163.170.2]:56567 "EHLO umail.unify.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:15:26 -0500 Message-ID: <419E5D46960FD211A2D5006008CAC79902E5C165@pcmailsrv1.sac.unify.com> From: "Manuel A. McLure" To: "'Jeff Garzik'" Cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: RE: Kernel 2.4.3 fails to compile Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 15:14:11 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Manuel A. McLure wrote: > > > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Manuel A. McLure wrote: > > > > > > > ... > > > > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall > > > -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 > > > > -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe > > > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 > > > > -march=athlon -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include > > > > /usr/src/linux/include/linux/modversions.h -c -o buz.o buz.c > > > > buz.c: In function `v4l_fbuffer_alloc': > > > > buz.c:188: `KMALLOC_MAXSIZE' undeclared (first use in > this function) > > > > buz.c:188: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > > > > buz.c:188: for each function it appears in.) > > > > > > Easy solution -- just delete the entire test > > > > > > if (size > KMALLOC_MAXSIZE) { > > > ... > > > } > > > > Thanks, I'll do that. It just seemed strange that the file was being > > compiled in the first place when the config option was not set. > > buz is built with CONFIG...ZORAN as well as CONFIG...BUZ. I dunno if > that's a bug or not... Yeah - I figured that out. I found that there were many places where KMALLOC_MAXSIZE was being used in buz.c so I removed CONFIG...ZORAN and the kernel is working now. It looks like the tulip driver isn't as up-to-date as the one from 2.4.2-ac20 - when is 2.4.3-ac1 due? :-) I got NETDEV WATCHDOG errors shortly after rebooting with 2.4.3, although these were of the "slow/packet lossy" type I got with 2.4.2-ac20 instead of the "network completely unusable" type I got with 2.4.2-ac11 and earlier. -- Manuel A. McLure - Unify Corp. Technical Support Space Ghost: "Hey, what happened to the-?" Moltar: "It's out." SG: "What about-?" M: "It's fixed." SG: "Eh, good. Good." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/