Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] PCI: dwc: Add support to use non default
 msi_irq_chip
To:     Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
        Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
CC:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
        "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20181219124207.13479-1-kishon@ti.com>
 <20181219124207.13479-8-kishon@ti.com>
From:   Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>
Message-ID: <d84eb74c-4006-b4ce-19b3-9f2e0f33e5a8@synopsys.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Jan 2019 10:12:32 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.3.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20181219124207.13479-8-kishon@ti.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On 19/12/2018 12:42, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Platforms using Designware IP uses dw_pci_msi_bottom_irq_chip for
> configuring the MSI controller logic within the Designware IP. However
> certain platforms like Keystone (K2G) which uses Desingware IP has
> it's own MSI controller logic. For handling such platforms,
> the irqchip ops uses msi_irq_ack, msi_set_irq, msi_clear_irq callback
> functions.

Keystone also uses get_msi_addr and get_msi_data callbacks, do you want to
update the description to add those references as well?

> 
> Add support to use different msi_irq_chip with default as
> dw_pci_msi_bottom_irq_chip. This is in preparation to get rid off
> msi_irq_ack, msi_set_irq, msi_clear_irq and other Keystone specific
> dw_pcie_host_ops.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 5 ++++-
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h      | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> index 0fa9e8fdce66..db21bd11f153 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++)
>  		irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq + i, bit + i,
> -				    &dw_pci_msi_bottom_irq_chip,
> +				    pp->msi_irq_chip,
>  				    pp, handle_edge_irq,
>  				    NULL, NULL);
>  
> @@ -277,6 +277,9 @@ int dw_pcie_allocate_domains(struct pcie_port *pp)
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
>  	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = of_node_to_fwnode(pci->dev->of_node);
>  
> +	if (!pp->msi_irq_chip)
> +		pp->msi_irq_chip = &dw_pci_msi_bottom_irq_chip;
> +
>  	pp->irq_domain = irq_domain_create_linear(fwnode, pp->num_vectors,
>  					       &dw_pcie_msi_domain_ops, pp);
>  	if (!pp->irq_domain) {
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> index 0989d880ac46..0873ee4084aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ struct pcie_port {
>  	struct irq_domain	*irq_domain;
>  	struct irq_domain	*msi_domain;
>  	dma_addr_t		msi_data;
> +	struct irq_chip		*msi_irq_chip;
>  	u32			num_vectors;
>  	u32			irq_status[MAX_MSI_CTRLS];
>  	raw_spinlock_t		lock;
> 

Acked-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>

Regards,
Gustavo