Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp503176imu; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 10:41:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XrJFNuljQvCWbzu/Zlgc2dqpRvYrQ9ktAFeZHHUD5iK4gzJkdP9Zh1Jth3UR+ou7Ta3dgp X-Received: by 2002:a62:5c1:: with SMTP id 184mr45056264pff.165.1546454506819; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 10:41:46 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1546454506; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OwX5GKU0WGTGRzueQP9Bs5IlaTM7A8KArb9rAr8DYJ5vBGn+z0YUxif3l+UqeZOJCJ dewBVEQni2G+zRjeoQW6vXQQhU3rR4yQwT0fcqrUcteLBVbXwe0mzW8QdMNbVqP1UcDb H45HbbKe0UUbn4ielltY3gD0Avat1tUuDBdMzQ6WW+iVXFcCIL+rvUd3JGCTCXzmAvVl rcHaKQN1AOtcLZOS9CLkjVeb/QGjCFhrFcBOUhuermVmzscn2RDM4ve3e2zOal9m/Cbj Z8Dorpw/+snUftCyACr1NRbVAPvlckKi7QLoqF4bmzgM6hPASg/v+MpUzmtMCm0zPedd J/Eg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:to:references:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=zoEN4e7FVLBdSCM0JYwFQBKnXFgM1dT6w5T9AKkbJH8=; b=XKKSCSfYUIU3R5Qu+BSxbKNG8KlMqZJcbfSQ2ENDpEb1mMYjaQ06CmZxXP1GXpCqb3 rbWysJ/3PRvkxwrecma9mv+//wnFslOUZPeM5Ehf4JL8FzDnAXCVco7W70z7UUrUU+hQ YF46AOXHtqbJXMvoqb8rektz4STOfk05QSD68fl9rJ4jaaKZUqkBjKTfE238ytK/ITIS TWJ94S2tZgPkqPNWm5UuxXMtXmp8ZidrVGa1AnGE3NcAPlwPfmKhiVyQCSwt+RY0WrEp Wpz5qw1IiByCcep2XvMSerqEdbxuU2RcNzz2KrBSufrka+8lCyyqrG/YCi1QVgxKg0g0 gWjQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=BiIw0OXC; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 64si48731411ply.372.2019.01.02.10.41.31; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 10:41:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=BiIw0OXC; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729676AbfABQ2L (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 2 Jan 2019 11:28:11 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:34363 "EHLO mail-wr1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729492AbfABQ2K (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jan 2019 11:28:10 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id j2so31128153wrw.1 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 08:28:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=zoEN4e7FVLBdSCM0JYwFQBKnXFgM1dT6w5T9AKkbJH8=; b=BiIw0OXCrudcQU0jcN1txwA/8FRcTFQA1AxQR5YzktjRsEHIJIAbu5rYwEbu3m+CZ6 YTm+fuD1qtRH9p3dY9OQrb3tzMg6q4R66WcI4x8WmgRVEpN7CEhjujAsotpvheB3dpLn OOqibQOGfEFtJRSqXhsOPJ2zDYrUPRHV6y1MY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=zoEN4e7FVLBdSCM0JYwFQBKnXFgM1dT6w5T9AKkbJH8=; b=R3ML6+q350SznuSCG+zzEAXpAQOk0p+m+jOxTDLBpoTSLqprO5ewuPjQJPaDUV/eU/ BabT8n5b4PX0aaUt7pgSLrQKrOY//9wKIxU6Z1qRQP3cRl5ehSO30Odr+S4ucMpHmYDA Y95d7+7AX/VEqtFoOgeOoqF4fH+nQkaPCCpV3Vj4VLqjXcx29lW8sp4iYKZPA2rt//2T Q7j6EFtkSRsKx0tGOsuuMIE0nCdd4Zgezoc0SqyOx8Sz9D9LYhO/G9LbI04Rfu7PlynV JpRiKQiBAszPot43JCtpN3+MvXh/K8X0MfAIIh/wOajBM2sipSefClXXD9GhQSY6jzNE tDbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeaO/YDLZZSqbcbOVSjEqUDKDI661f6OMi+DXQRljsGXGFO4T4V MUZ1rS2v23jKqbVP8j5wkkzhwA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:9d08:: with SMTP id k8mr41141220wre.203.1546446488156; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 08:28:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([88.147.66.57]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x3sm39486974wrd.19.2019.01.02.08.28.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Jan 2019 08:28:07 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/10] unify the interface of the proportional-share policy in blkio/io From: Paolo Valente In-Reply-To: <20190102160328.GR2509588@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 17:28:05 +0100 Cc: 'Paolo Valente' via bfq-iosched , Angelo Ruocco , Jens Axboe , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Li Zefan , Angelo Ruocco , Dennis Zhou , Josef Bacik , Liu Bo , Bart Van Assche , Johannes Weiner , linux-block , linux-kernel , Ulf Hansson , Linus Walleij , broonie@kernel.org, oleksandr@natalenko.name, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <7D7FAB43-5F62-4402-A9B3-E7C2E30AE680@linaro.org> <20181130184256.GI2509588@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> <5534B7D4-A5D9-4F44-9620-970A7F9EC140@linaro.org> <874A0232-2103-4364-BD88-F33B85D6A764@linaro.org> <20181218164126.GX2509588@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> <20181227234144.GE2509588@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> <20190102160328.GR2509588@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> To: Tejun Heo X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Il giorno 2 gen 2019, alle ore 17:03, Tejun Heo ha scritto: > > Hello, Paolo. > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 11:25:25AM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote: >> What's the benefit of throwing away months of work, on which we agreed >> before starting it, and that solves a problem already acknowledged by >> interested parties? > > Showing multiple conflicting numbers definitely isn't anything which > is agreed upon. > Sorry, of course you din't realize that sharing interface files had this consequence, otherwise you'd have protested beforehand. The problem is that this consequence seems unavoidable: if two policies have different numbers to convey, through a shared interface file, then they must be allowed to write their different numbers. To me, this doesn't sound like a problem. The only other natural option is no unification, unless you have a third way. What do you prefer, or propose? Thanks, Paolo > Thanks. > > -- > tejun