Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp71683imu; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 14:19:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6ZB+X+1KuQ92PZVyov2zljg+koZpXYAnL4DNDifUwBGL2LlEqZuAGBa0hCNbZ2VtNfS1yK X-Received: by 2002:a63:5761:: with SMTP id h33mr18539064pgm.283.1546553957993; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 14:19:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1546553957; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ck3yZvuJPiW11J4V36eun9Jw8UhLUgVcl4lNcalA3Y1XeZNCAOfJ34CKZr4mgDvgub MMRygZSdraO+Z0wjSoql18YSg5w+pAbTFRMsH2JNLKbYm4bgXRNdqXfjif51Y40qDIRH megTK5jyxYI6WupfItcHQtyY6YmbzHU/IPtJlLzkgUPvandyUvv/8wowWT7OGVwvIgh3 iZu/deAlWr4GjwZGldpxX8edaANeCjpIGnMhfWAknR6xNES1Ig6RZwtw3tkm1oJZJoc3 yacNtaXDuxe5atvkuoblAacjz4fR9qrC56XhTy830qbkQAte9IBfzPOTLA/gkLsvUVXy 3zlw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=A4aQNIK++2OFjzVt2CQOMYWozqdUG8deKPHsV2CVouU=; b=pDD4iNYDf/hfcwA4VHjRqklQsi///TXnr9OqKX+RvnReY3PxUribr2x3QbRxnyE2ZU KoIfbk8jD2Dq5LpdBnErnXKwBWzNHGZ4Y+/d2J/C8wAVzIednn+qJb0+fVZOkI69oiOV 4msP1osx/cdD3CeoFBcmTD7Xy1dlChP7CJ5tw850qHdDhpG/mtSX5HlD+/u2j7rbd8jn 3nUfV9sYB5MfJWm7BrPznugf7I8LvxFyqKBwdDCdJWH1K21vKB/lt5pMWHWLvvAc0WdQ TIIEE2TL13zAdj0S4TaKKcM+LgPwkJGhfn0dyBbNT1VHyIeVgWKiAhKqo5Enzuq7p/db wWKw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@lca.pw header.s=google header.b=LisEPkzP; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x16si51688387pga.407.2019.01.03.14.18.58; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 14:19:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@lca.pw header.s=google header.b=LisEPkzP; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732324AbfACQig (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 3 Jan 2019 11:38:36 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f194.google.com ([209.85.222.194]:45704 "EHLO mail-qk1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729598AbfACQig (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2019 11:38:36 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f194.google.com with SMTP id y78so19961475qka.12 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 08:38:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lca.pw; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=A4aQNIK++2OFjzVt2CQOMYWozqdUG8deKPHsV2CVouU=; b=LisEPkzPle9cP9gPNnD8SiFxWD5vORfaZZ9dYAj2ITTrPCjgwLcWzxSnyLNkFSWTag 6ND4FuaHHQGNj87ZNjf5900I2aPsRE2L64AoOXI3METUFxzSn+ymy6HwO5fy8VWq16rd H4IBjdyGBHlG4i7/nZsNytNYFPK/KVjmuQIeSowErcEMbxkAk+EutBeN7N47luMvD1xY SmrqojVg1la4KymSJpTAVcRzH/e1xF2/ZxEWDJWjCnF6noenWeJve5ILEL6WJpbj4YxK G+mcQ5H5wf72CUvDFYilNI5wskSrWvo2JSapg/w7+2Oy5F5GDE0+7Y6DIKswAx6GQmjd +vtQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=A4aQNIK++2OFjzVt2CQOMYWozqdUG8deKPHsV2CVouU=; b=ZHj2hzFzSTjHQQxwQ8m3cmeZVg//L7WQFIrpUsiJ5XrcXAalr9kg7ePyqk7njFZK7b W7TekENl6GNbh80zJHNAfC6GuAsg2F4pNY1GSnPZOuYGLpFlsKs/iE8L7QI9vf3WKREN uCuiCYl8D/2bFB2TEehtE0jPHTUWJ6NFwd/WyTH9L9YQA5DXowTH2B+sR205P8Jcj85d Izok/zVu7jtzBNc/j0tNGZheh3T1U5ATDMCe87iq2RHyUJelH3zEThuYso2x/RQfS05r kVsnGzgVO/+caAc8NQYyqSUyg7CAVDOxxqW0lkgQVm/n5xWT0TAnxj9dW2pPvDeGjMke Ll/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcaCEZBlusvolUADlm7dbJjpDN9FwU/3ggzWSq0wlgztcTxNp2d zv+don02oNxIKfSAQkei2uC1K2hCzAniNg== X-Received: by 2002:a37:2cc2:: with SMTP id s185mr43606878qkh.74.1546533513568; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 08:38:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ovpn-120-55.rdu2.redhat.com (pool-71-184-117-43.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [71.184.117.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g23sm30605821qta.24.2019.01.03.08.38.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Jan 2019 08:38:33 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/page_owner: fix for deferred struct page init To: Michal Hocko Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com, mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, yang.shi@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20181220185031.43146-1-cai@lca.pw> <20181220203156.43441-1-cai@lca.pw> <20190103115114.GL31793@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: Qian Cai Message-ID: Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 11:38:31 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190103115114.GL31793@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/3/19 6:51 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 20-12-18 15:31:56, Qian Cai wrote: >> When booting a system with "page_owner=on", >> >> start_kernel >> page_ext_init >> invoke_init_callbacks >> init_section_page_ext >> init_page_owner >> init_early_allocated_pages >> init_zones_in_node >> init_pages_in_zone >> lookup_page_ext >> page_to_nid >> >> The issue here is that page_to_nid() will not work since some page >> flags have no node information until later in page_alloc_init_late() due >> to DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT. Hence, it could trigger an out-of-bounds >> access with an invalid nid. >> >> [ 8.666047] UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in ./include/linux/mm.h:1104:50 >> [ 8.672603] index 7 is out of range for type 'zone [5]' >> >> Also, kernel will panic since flags were poisoned earlier with, >> >> CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGFLAGS=y >> CONFIG_NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS=n >> >> start_kernel >> setup_arch >> pagetable_init >> paging_init >> sparse_init >> sparse_init_nid >> memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw >> >> Although later it tries to set page flags for pages in reserved bootmem >> regions, >> >> mm_init >> mem_init >> memblock_free_all >> free_low_memory_core_early >> reserve_bootmem_region >> >> there could still have some freed pages from the page allocator but yet >> to be initialized due to DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT. It have already been >> dealt with a bit in page_ext_init(). >> >> * Take into account DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT. >> */ >> if (early_pfn_to_nid(pfn) != nid) >> continue; >> >> However, it did not handle it well in init_pages_in_zone() which end up >> calling page_to_nid(). >> >> [ 11.917212] page:ffffea0004200000 is uninitialized and poisoned >> [ 11.917220] raw: ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff >> ffffffffffffffff >> [ 11.921745] raw: ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff >> ffffffffffffffff >> [ 11.924523] page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(p)) >> [ 11.926498] page_owner info is not active (free page?) >> [ 12.329560] kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:990! >> [ 12.337632] RIP: 0010:init_page_owner+0x486/0x520 >> >> Since there is no other routines depend on page_ext_init() in >> start_kernel(), just move it after page_alloc_init_late() to ensure that >> there is no deferred pages need to de dealt with. If deselected >> DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT, it is still better to call page_ext_init() >> earlier, so page owner could catch more early page allocation call >> sites. This gives us a good compromise between catching good and bad >> call sites (See the v1 patch [1]) in case of DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT. >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181220060303.38686-1-cai@lca.pw/ >> >> Fixes: fe53ca54270 (mm: use early_pfn_to_nid in page_ext_init) >> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko >> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai >> --- >> >> v3: still call page_ext_init() earlier if DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT=n. >> >> v2: postpone page_ext_init() to after page_alloc_init_late(). >> >> init/main.c | 5 +++++ >> mm/page_ext.c | 3 +-- >> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c >> index 2b7b7fe173c9..5d9904370f76 100644 >> --- a/init/main.c >> +++ b/init/main.c >> @@ -696,7 +696,9 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init start_kernel(void) >> initrd_start = 0; >> } >> #endif >> +#ifndef CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT >> page_ext_init(); >> +#endif >> kmemleak_init(); >> setup_per_cpu_pageset(); >> numa_policy_init(); >> @@ -1147,6 +1149,9 @@ static noinline void __init kernel_init_freeable(void) >> sched_init_smp(); >> >> page_alloc_init_late(); >> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT >> + page_ext_init(); >> +#endif >> >> do_basic_setup(); > > Is this really necessary? Why cannot we simply postpone page_ext_init > unconditioanally? As mentioned above, "If deselected DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT, it is still better to call page_ext_init() earlier, so page owner could catch more early page allocation call sites." > >> >> diff --git a/mm/page_ext.c b/mm/page_ext.c >> index ae44f7adbe07..d76fd51e312a 100644 >> --- a/mm/page_ext.c >> +++ b/mm/page_ext.c >> @@ -399,9 +399,8 @@ void __init page_ext_init(void) >> * -------------pfn--------------> >> * N0 | N1 | N2 | N0 | N1 | N2|.... >> * >> - * Take into account DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT. >> */ >> - if (early_pfn_to_nid(pfn) != nid) >> + if (pfn_to_nid(pfn) != nid) >> continue; >> if (init_section_page_ext(pfn, nid)) >> goto oom; > > Also this doesn't seem to be related, right? No, it is related. Because of this patch, page_ext_init() is called after all the memory has already been initialized, so no longer necessary to call early_pfn_to_nid().