Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp283558imu; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 19:50:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7sVQi+Dx+w1+To+uNCYVfFWO89VBwxcuh91YqJTIzkt4PcEnHLRUUxfB+vLJl0+t54kgmp X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a411:: with SMTP id p17mr48927205plq.292.1546573844950; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 19:50:44 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1546573844; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MVUS0SBWknGBh9qiBBd7fRmDHwHDdxMwOL6vhB6NBe3wiMgXB0ztDNvFIJEvyg4yeI Sxrv7syZ0l/mrVrTsGnmQOSOR2U9Dup38h5cL6atEECCEG0iOsGndn9LG1pibcQa+W7Q m3RLx8B2An4MZWKbwwwB+wH2gsPCXDX1kLU3J+N2V8jn77SOJZGmEZGD+wHU8vVWN3rq E16KhCbih18jM9L+b+66VTCOnixdGgHpOSL48ilTME00eiyz9+kpBW/KkkfGw9vnjWAU +apXW/YrC4/q8KxmTobLLgRqThD3SAvjJDgIOBTp0iiNPU/TCkSEimMAtZjDORzRT4k2 yVeA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=bgPlSEX1NNlfds0XlPeP6KfkO5xHPBhjSe4RYyLZb2k=; b=H67VlSX7vsmi8tZ1WuEPKFlMLRZwO0GomjYUPABc6PjL1f5zTsBNjUBN3VQcc0Z2Cp /XvXdsCKUpNkToLJwyIGVWeMwF2BtoEiOBfmyd4RbTrcPOhAzWTJi1KfYYbDpLlqt/ZK kd7o3BhMm/p7fxB47IroQQNGG+Y2LaPqf8IhlZp70x5XUgRqhUxyUU/sxnrYh5PWfo3b PE+OsouymhIlRuDTHIgvgaiW85KKD0mcUwSMJPP8aXyEAHGBXGjg+Wcqhbk9qcDiZnur UpXaeFmCOrHWDHqxOmaCuBDtMtQFzJbXxtKwOBFRKvl/Jcn5d6osC2PEB1lHJpczyjeI kjEw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=YNK291+R; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a19si3016675pgn.102.2019.01.03.19.50.30; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 19:50:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=YNK291+R; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726756AbfACXKf (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 3 Jan 2019 18:10:35 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f195.google.com ([209.85.215.195]:34223 "EHLO mail-pg1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726549AbfACXKe (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2019 18:10:34 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f195.google.com with SMTP id j10so16630172pga.1 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:10:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=bgPlSEX1NNlfds0XlPeP6KfkO5xHPBhjSe4RYyLZb2k=; b=YNK291+Rb3VtbdQC5ujxx6Z6dPBtlJYgod0Kgn7D6/f3dKMYlZ14aEZg6ZeeO8ugy4 bY/FIpEdvtzX4yDPssElSogdgM1+wQZTK+9T/33Np6QjJ9IbPJZ9glpdyW8yfg1JKYmC IO263aDrkiZ0zr5zh6exyJnhHALeBI8kVrE+M= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=bgPlSEX1NNlfds0XlPeP6KfkO5xHPBhjSe4RYyLZb2k=; b=nrj+e2ejN8zeci+KO+ZVTDDFHa6isYil1sIoSwtBdupi7A5qVEAaZdDWKbuoknmzHA 3+oRYT72rNM6yAZQ2SZWRGBzDN88o1YPHT8keitzx6aJt+1ePqWEnXEMXjV+WQ/JjXOf OnCXZ1s6DjygGdLTNcqKHas08n1YkEo2S/5TYVcmNdk+7LbIokFS99nBlz7w4hwDW5rL q+QvOiP/5HOyV4V7t3v8lC4UKT/iMT1pSpWo4f6REPW/6i5WYwuuxPV4uJWKTzgAcuUU TcTHpclj/fMM/p7XV6HFJ0mbBpZIiRDkL2/j1e+8psHNEPUS0WrD8hiE1KX8/rXVpcCZ 8M7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdWkXXV6jgcNhRpcZkURNM4jFnmrkFpozo/uE6Ej5ob0A/kbxMe mmQJUazMzQB9VjB777SSumpSSw== X-Received: by 2002:a62:c302:: with SMTP id v2mr50507921pfg.155.1546557033364; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:10:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from builder (104-188-17-28.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net. [104.188.17.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l184sm85622488pfc.112.2019.01.03.15.10.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:10:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:09:28 -0800 From: Bjorn Andersson To: Sibi Sankar Cc: david.brown@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, andy.gross@linaro.org, briannorris@chromium.org, akdwived@codeaurora.org, clew@codeaurora.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org, ohad@wizery.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] remoteproc: qcom: Add support for parsing fw dt bindings Message-ID: <20190103230928.GF31596@builder> References: <20181228044819.5697-1-sibis@codeaurora.org> <20181228044819.5697-3-sibis@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181228044819.5697-3-sibis@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 27 Dec 20:48 PST 2018, Sibi Sankar wrote: > Add support for parsing "firmware-name" dt bindings which specifies > the relative paths of mba/modem/pas image as strings. Fallback to > the default paths for mba/modem/pas image on -EINVAL. > > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar Thanks Sibi, just some minor style issues I would prefer to have fixed. I picked patch 1, so no need to resend that. > --- > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++------- > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 11 ++++++- > 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c > index 01be7314e176..c75179006e24 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c > @@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ struct q6v5 { > bool has_alt_reset; > int mpss_perm; > int mba_perm; > + const char *hexagon_mdt_image; > int version; > }; > > @@ -860,17 +861,27 @@ static int q6v5_mpss_load(struct q6v5 *qproc) > phys_addr_t min_addr = PHYS_ADDR_MAX; > phys_addr_t max_addr = 0; > bool relocate = false; > - char seg_name[10]; > + char *fw_name; > + size_t fw_name_len; > ssize_t offset; > size_t size = 0; > void *ptr; > int ret; > int i; > > - ret = request_firmware(&fw, "modem.mdt", qproc->dev); > + fw_name_len = strlen(qproc->hexagon_mdt_image); > + if (fw_name_len <= 4) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + fw_name = kstrdup(qproc->hexagon_mdt_image, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!fw_name) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + ret = request_firmware(&fw, qproc->hexagon_mdt_image, qproc->dev); Use fw_name here. > if (ret < 0) { > - dev_err(qproc->dev, "unable to load modem.mdt\n"); > - return ret; > + dev_err(qproc->dev, "unable to load %s\n", > + qproc->hexagon_mdt_image); > + goto out; > } > > /* Initialize the RMB validator */ > @@ -918,10 +929,12 @@ static int q6v5_mpss_load(struct q6v5 *qproc) > ptr = qproc->mpss_region + offset; > > if (phdr->p_filesz) { > - snprintf(seg_name, sizeof(seg_name), "modem.b%02d", i); > - ret = request_firmware(&seg_fw, seg_name, qproc->dev); > + snprintf(fw_name + fw_name_len - 3, fw_name_len, > + "b%02d", i); > + ret = request_firmware(&seg_fw, fw_name, qproc->dev); > if (ret) { > - dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to load %s\n", seg_name); > + dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to load %s\n", > + fw_name); Follow my lead and break the 80-char limit. > goto release_firmware; > } > > @@ -960,6 +973,8 @@ static int q6v5_mpss_load(struct q6v5 *qproc) > > release_firmware: > release_firmware(fw); > +out: > + kfree(fw_name); > > return ret < 0 ? ret : 0; > } > @@ -1075,9 +1090,10 @@ static int qcom_q6v5_register_dump_segments(struct rproc *rproc, > unsigned long i; > int ret; > > - ret = request_firmware(&fw, "modem.mdt", qproc->dev); > + ret = request_firmware(&fw, qproc->hexagon_mdt_image, qproc->dev); > if (ret < 0) { > - dev_err(qproc->dev, "unable to load modem.mdt\n"); > + dev_err(qproc->dev, "unable to load %s\n", > + qproc->hexagon_mdt_image); > return ret; > } > > @@ -1253,6 +1269,8 @@ static int q6v5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > const struct rproc_hexagon_res *desc; > struct q6v5 *qproc; > struct rproc *rproc; > + const char *mba_image; > + const char *fw_name[2]; > int ret; > > desc = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev); > @@ -1262,8 +1280,15 @@ static int q6v5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (desc->need_mem_protection && !qcom_scm_is_available()) > return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > + ret = of_property_read_string_array(pdev->dev.of_node, "firmware-name", > + fw_name, 2); > + if (ret != -EINVAL && ret != 2) > + return ret > 0 ? -EINVAL : ret; > + > + mba_image = (ret != 2) ? desc->hexagon_mba_image : fw_name[0]; Use the fact that of_property_read_string_index() leaves the output parameter untouched if it doesn't succeed in parsing the property. I.e. do: mba_image = desc->hexagon_mba_image; ret = of_property_read_string_index(pdev->dev.of_node, "firmware-name", 0, &mba_image); if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL) fail(); and qproc->hexagon_mdt_image = "modem.mdt"; ret = of_property_read_string_index(pdev->dev.of_node, "firmware-name", 1, &qproc->hexagon_mdt_image); if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL) fail(); > + > rproc = rproc_alloc(&pdev->dev, pdev->name, &q6v5_ops, > - desc->hexagon_mba_image, sizeof(*qproc)); > + mba_image, sizeof(*qproc)); > if (!rproc) { > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to allocate rproc\n"); > return -ENOMEM; > @@ -1272,6 +1297,7 @@ static int q6v5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > qproc = (struct q6v5 *)rproc->priv; > qproc->dev = &pdev->dev; > qproc->rproc = rproc; > + qproc->hexagon_mdt_image = (ret != 2) ? "modem.mdt" : fw_name[1]; > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, qproc); > > ret = q6v5_init_mem(qproc, pdev); > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c > index b1e63fcd5fdf..141c7da29e9a 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c > @@ -258,6 +258,8 @@ static int adsp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > const struct adsp_data *desc; > struct qcom_adsp *adsp; > struct rproc *rproc; > + const char *fw_name; > + const char *of_fw_name; > int ret; > > desc = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev); > @@ -267,8 +269,15 @@ static int adsp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (!qcom_scm_is_available()) > return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > + ret = of_property_read_string(pdev->dev.of_node, "firmware-name", > + &of_fw_name); > + if (ret && ret != -EINVAL) > + return ret; > + > + fw_name = ret ? desc->firmware_name : of_fw_name; As above, please use the fact that the last parameter of of_property_read_string() doesn't modify the output if it fails. > + > rproc = rproc_alloc(&pdev->dev, pdev->name, &adsp_ops, > - desc->firmware_name, sizeof(*adsp)); > + fw_name, sizeof(*adsp)); > if (!rproc) { > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n"); > return -ENOMEM; Regards, Bjorn