Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp647481imu; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 04:40:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN631FtAGOn8zGr/YSwpdSex2etKS/atf5YtYzDoWoIYefOALDDoqxUhshvScuuCKMZ9RTR/ X-Received: by 2002:a63:4f5e:: with SMTP id p30mr1539013pgl.71.1546605623717; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 04:40:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1546605623; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WdJ6UJ3nYjrBRa6TpJ1snx5unH0xoell4n/7b8a1AdRrrhIFZduh48ZvGDEBHmcE7g KMWtMnes9Xlx+SAhL43rFZHN2BWrxYTG7igxbL07b8pP1Lc+B4Yc+k9COvZa9cq5V53r Zu3ORS7jokFxI9sMuySmIWTRkkmy2CCaVkJ63AYChu5mMfpNFne43gAsss1hE5F7WUjq XohfVHEIhRoOJ1ZC3HeplVeuBNjMsJDaK9RDR7Zxb2j5yb14974bETRV6WmLDbpL5Eh7 gX06nB2mYh/WfMj4h5qa993PEUyDHwClijWb0aVjDye4dEsqIg0AhFITIQPDeFtJ46Ug 7n6A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:organization:date:subject:cc:to :from; bh=3GGNIwM0K9hc6WuCaMg4F6e5sFF/k/QU6KJrX8sN7I0=; b=PAmy0awQ9bN2Nhz+dWzy07xg/6TBadmJUBl1/1gnei3KRpxdUV/kawk22jmLwXxLKb mPpmyBNBzRwqO1R3jWGosAKQDNpm46XMydoGo8W8AA0CeYvcUqTwouvT5pE22wyLSudA UjdtkyYC3QkjfQZ4nsjjHHAmHGBKtqImrZQdfb0hgjupH3EF0ER8JM0XDNmod5vJKSK/ b0EtFPFkRKw2gJtpbwSzrk59o9vs/p8h/C3taDau6BCIxgYKGLxuUXjs41XCEhbjvdS5 ZoQ75cIZZJfuXjFzhZJ2Y3J95hrWDqn/HqvNj2aXldH2D44Jw6ubkst67ycNwNAAXFOV uywA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f4si52044019plf.370.2019.01.04.04.40.08; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 04:40:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727426AbfADKzb (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 4 Jan 2019 05:55:31 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:60254 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726459AbfADKza (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2019 05:55:30 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id x04AsQ1I034472 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 05:55:29 -0500 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2pt3nw74nt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 05:55:29 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 10:55:26 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 4 Jan 2019 10:55:22 -0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x04AtKjd4325772 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 4 Jan 2019 10:55:21 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B320DA406B; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 10:55:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992A0A405B; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 10:55:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.85.74.200]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 10:55:17 +0000 (GMT) From: Chandan Rajendra To: Pierre-Louis Bossart Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "moderated list:INTEL ASoC DRIVERS" , Sinan Kaya , Jie Yang , Takashi Iwai , open list , Liam Girdwood , ACPI Devel Mailing List , Mark Brown , Linux Next Mailing List , "Ted Ts'o" , Chandan Rajendra Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 08/11] ASoC: Intel: atom: Make PCI dependency explicit Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 16:25:37 +0530 Organization: IBM In-Reply-To: References: <20190102181038.4418-1-okaya@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19010410-0012-0000-0000-000002E1C976 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19010410-0013-0000-0000-00002118CBD7 Message-Id: <17399292.N8n9nqCdrl@localhost.localdomain> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-01-04_04:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901040098 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, January 3, 2019 9:58:28 PM IST Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > >>> arch/ia64/Kconfig:126:error: recursive dependency detected! > >>> arch/ia64/Kconfig:126: choice contains symbol IA64_HP_SIM > >>> arch/ia64/Kconfig:200: symbol IA64_HP_SIM is part of choice PM > >>> kernel/power/Kconfig:144: symbol PM is selected by PM_SLEEP > >>> kernel/power/Kconfig:104: symbol PM_SLEEP depends on HIBERNATE_CALLBACKS > >>> kernel/power/Kconfig:31: symbol HIBERNATE_CALLBACKS is selected by > >>> HIBERNATION > >>> kernel/power/Kconfig:34: symbol HIBERNATION depends on SWAP > >>> init/Kconfig:250: symbol SWAP depends on BLOCK > >>> block/Kconfig:5: symbol BLOCK is selected by UBIFS_FS > >>> fs/ubifs/Kconfig:1: symbol UBIFS_FS depends on MISC_FILESYSTEMS > >>> fs/Kconfig:220: symbol MISC_FILESYSTEMS is selected by ACPI_APEI > >>> drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig:8: symbol ACPI_APEI depends on ACPI > >>> drivers/acpi/Kconfig:9: symbol ACPI depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI > >>> <<<< LOOK HERE > >>> drivers/acpi/Kconfig:6: symbol ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI is selected by > >>> IA64_HP_SIM > >>> arch/ia64/Kconfig:200: symbol IA64_HP_SIM is part of choice > >>> > >>> At any rate, a 3 mn git bisect tells me the circular dependency is > >>> exposed by this change: > >>> > >>> f3fd6cd74fedf99b6060f75df00943fda13b65f2 is the first bad commit > >>> commit f3fd6cd74fedf99b6060f75df00943fda13b65f2 > >>> Author: Chandan Rajendra > >>> Date: Sat Dec 8 12:21:38 2018 +0530 > >>> > >>> fscrypt: remove filesystem specific build config option > >>> > >>> In order to have a common code base for fscrypt "post read" processing > >>> for all filesystems which support encryption, this commit removes > >>> filesystem specific build config option (e.g. > >>> CONFIG_EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION) > >>> and replaces it with a build option (i.e. CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION) whose > >>> value affects all the filesystems making use of fscrypt. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra > >>> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o > >>> > >> FWIW, The patch at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10725883/ fixes this > >> problem by removing "select BLOCK if FS_ENCRYPTION" from fs/ubifs/Kconfig. > > OK > > > > Pierre-Louis, can you check if this patch makes the issue go away for > > you, please? > > Wondering if Chandan provided the right pointer, I wasn't able to apply > this patch, but commenting out "select BLOCK if FS_ENCRYPTION" in > fs/ubifs/Kconfig makes the circular dependency go away. All good for me. > V4 version of the patchset (which is part of linux-next) had introduced the "select BLOCK if FS_ENCRYPTION". The V5 patchset omits that line. Hence the patch did not apply cleanly. However just commenting out that line was the right thing to do. -- chandan