Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265583AbUAZXqe (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2004 18:46:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265630AbUAZXoL (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2004 18:44:11 -0500 Received: from mtvcafw.sgi.com ([192.48.171.6]:42118 "EHLO zok.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265628AbUAZXnf (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2004 18:43:35 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:41:59 +1100 From: Nathan Scott To: Bryan Whitehead Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.2-rc1-mm3] fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c Message-ID: <20040126234159.GD781@frodo> References: <20040125044859.8A67F13A354@mrhankey.megahappy.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040125044859.8A67F13A354@mrhankey.megahappy.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 864 Lines: 23 On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 08:48:59PM -0800, Bryan Whitehead wrote: > On compile I get this: > > fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c: In function `xlog_recover_reorder_trans': > fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c:1534: warning: `flags' might be used uninitialized in this function > > I previously sent this patch and it was wrong. What compiler version are you using? Is this a recent gcc or an older version - if the former, is gcc really getting dumber? if the latter, I'm wondering why I haven't come across this anytime in the last few years of compiling xfs. Or is this some non-gcc compiler out of left field? thanks. -- Nathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/