Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp3747466imu; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 08:44:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6HA60mnLqk2gkdyPjRTrp3BWa3/NC9rNb/88rBVwOJd6UwSIqV87VC4YNdVZU6n7x+Q7lT X-Received: by 2002:a63:7154:: with SMTP id b20mr11458543pgn.342.1546879463801; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 08:44:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1546879463; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=y4Up9+jtgDcZt1XcjuvFT/k6mge3GAX7AEPDSFYJ9cfuQ+2gI/ndFQelpLY5zJwRCb M3T5hfXw7vc+0BvyxjD4tAnmxiKRmjWqrJ5oSaFMq4QzYqb+fXPgkShAywI9yO6q/HDE McEK1sItX5ujookFEW0M/ZwQVtnXrRh4w1U0KRlntLqc6cBkfHtozgOuQWFnAuQJb9l6 ASBeDyXBmXc7O8kIWxicwNqzfJaxtGYnAmcK5bfLPOmVym+2uct/K8KFCxG+BYY0AoJx cEYisrcBq+utp4UuYHGgZamM1BJhHRubKnFRnw/ZcnGMI0ue1tnJwi5kmxlRQ7Qe5rZK I4+Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=TidIADdjCwnRgzsBcRP1UeEULkHESer3HI9ddcF9f7E=; b=D+0d0TnGZC0rcGvc80D5gnqmcOiy4Bormu94tH+2raxczKYDqtIOt4G+zwFSjxANd7 B0EWE1ydzpUyZsVNl8CdYtxPfYfssVnluTlEZqjg7gdMcw8GZcRm0snrjnv1GgK31OoY 7N6bChNEiF4D2FI3+xk+nelC/HXALs7vFmxquSHYY2n9nKZfFuyRZD6mXe6Fyyy6ejXg ieYbYFzuejXI8e74uQP/zlMoPDggIJRwCU90PhGLfJ154/7t2+d8jEX7mwOi2CgNjrUm nt4qlnpG5qmx/NtC4VwU3OQoAwjJzjrzSb35PUFPTGdzSIg8TGGbvTRVLWS9ENvzcDqi jPfg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeblueprint-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b="dAdlCps/"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v61si14023194plb.54.2019.01.07.08.44.08; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 08:44:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeblueprint-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b="dAdlCps/"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727299AbfAGP54 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 7 Jan 2019 10:57:56 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f66.google.com ([209.85.208.66]:46154 "EHLO mail-ed1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726955AbfAGP5z (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2019 10:57:55 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f66.google.com with SMTP id o10so1320560edt.13 for ; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 07:57:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codeblueprint-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=TidIADdjCwnRgzsBcRP1UeEULkHESer3HI9ddcF9f7E=; b=dAdlCps/T+ADFgpLeqFaZkFbLtkaZSl77ci7PFBLnpcctqWVA1hUlBYdLTPGu6h8Uv qIf+AD1ymqWBz4tfClmtiqvXEbyEn42ujEj/CC59OhUkBZATSZc8wN6lhU6jw6+M9Fyb X0GeFlsExAqqR78NDs6maLaLU9EaESqce2dm4zGziZqxqa153d12wo8TvnfaQqrXNlNC sHO9dHv8a/H0QipmP+/X55K82PtDfQl1kgmV9ebAiY+fqFkeOFSXfNEOC9ABVUBfRARm IVwc3ck5vbpvQocTd3xjI4YQoUh6vV88efNcbHn+egTQSD0faVXP4/yKBQTMwn9VDcTo Lh0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=TidIADdjCwnRgzsBcRP1UeEULkHESer3HI9ddcF9f7E=; b=jQ3FkgSV9oVxfgcmOP2R9A4q2z7uVR4o+mgKixNAnOT0INWQUk7A0aQCs+ZcWUy/gz MdWznRCCgUhwo7k3HeMeXsPrGjeSY6yHGSCKXJXj6zp9Cm+59FPOrkbWAJtrwiwUmmqe ZcTW25SV/PHPs/GSctOWv2Dh4EAjGX3jgqVwIt5rUAiC937XZ20wMmKK6/vbawHoLQ0B GrPNxHFY66fJYM/aGDJCURzOcBtKAJkImrbu6ealUoQTNiUH1g9vEfQyz2MaCAGJD8+e KY9nm5YJMIxujvf8mmjb2XsJ/Hv8f+MV+fwX8FrSSDuks+xtLEfmzB7vbYOnfWMsio2n ChrQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYB3jjMb6jpOykzxKNGQO6/f6CLYceiqJrgXxnOczA861yEX6iN A1kSiJ5wn5eOQLMuqgJ+LXboxw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2615:: with SMTP id h21-v6mr48067669ejc.21.1546876673828; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 07:57:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (0547277e.skybroadband.com. [5.71.39.126]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j8sm29619888ede.55.2019.01.07.07.57.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Jan 2019 07:57:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 15:57:52 +0000 From: Matt Fleming To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Borislav Petkov , "Prakhya, Sai Praneeth" , Ingo Molnar , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "x86@kernel.org" , "marc.zyngier@arm.com" , "eric.snowberg@oracle.com" , "hdegoede@redhat.com" , "Hansen, Dave" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com" , "julien.thierry@arm.com" , "bhsharma@redhat.com" , "jonathanh@nvidia.com" , "joe@perches.com" , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" , "natechancellor@gmail.com" , "luto@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "sedat.dilek@gmail.com" , "zhuyifei1999@gmail.com" , "linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [tip:efi/core] x86/efi: Unmap EFI boot services code/data regions from efi_pgd Message-ID: <20190107155356.GA7578@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <20181221171308.GJ1325@zn.tnic> <20181221192928.GM1325@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 22 Dec, at 12:07:48PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 at 20:29, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 06:26:23PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 at 18:13, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 06:02:29PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > > > As far as I can tell, the SGI x86 UV platforms still rely on this, so > > > > > we're stuck with it for the foreseeable future. > > > > > > > > What happened with the old apple laptops which couldn't handle high > > > > virtual mappings and needed 1:1? We don't care anymore? > > > > > > > > > > If that is the case (I wouldn't know) then yes, there is a second > > > reason why we need to keep this code. > > > > Fleming knows details and he's on CC, lemme "pull" him up into To: :-) > > > > IIUC the 1:1 mapping and the 'old' mapping are two different things, > and the new mapping also contains a 1:1 mapping of the boot services > regions, at least until SetVirtualAddressMap() returns. Yep, they're different. And yes the 1:1 mapping should stick around with the new scheme IIRC (it's been a while).