Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 7 Jan 2019 08:56:07 -0800
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To:     Kalyani Akula <kalyani.akula@xilinx.com>
Cc:     herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Kalyani Akula <kalyania@xilinx.com>,
        Sarat Chand Savitala <saratcha@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] crypto: Add Xilinx SHA3 driver
Message-ID: <20190107165606.GA2077@gmail.com>
References: <1546851776-3456-1-git-send-email-kalyani.akula@xilinx.com>
 <1546851776-3456-3-git-send-email-kalyani.akula@xilinx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1546851776-3456-3-git-send-email-kalyani.akula@xilinx.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Kalyani,

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:32:55PM +0530, Kalyani Akula wrote:
> This patch adds SHA3 driver suuport for the Xilinx
> ZynqMP SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kalyani Akula <kalyani.akula@xilinx.com>
[...]
> +
> +static struct ahash_alg sha3_alg = {
> +	.init		= zynqmp_sha_init,
> +	.update		= zynqmp_sha_update,
> +	.final		= zynqmp_sha_final,
> +	.finup		= zynqmp_sha_finup,
> +	.digest		= zynqmp_sha_digest,
> +	.export		= zynqmp_sha_export,
> +	.import		= zynqmp_sha_import,
> +	.halg = {
> +		.digestsize	= SHA384_DIGEST_SIZE,
> +		.statesize	= sizeof(struct sha256_state),
> +		.base	= {
> +			.cra_name		= "xilinx-keccak-384",
> +			.cra_driver_name	= "zynqmp-keccak-384",
> +			.cra_priority		= 300,
> +			.cra_flags		= CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC,
> +			.cra_blocksize		= SHA384_BLOCK_SIZE,
> +			.cra_ctxsize		= sizeof(struct zynqmp_sha_ctx),
> +			.cra_alignmask		= 0,
> +			.cra_module		= THIS_MODULE,
> +			.cra_init		= zynqmp_sha_cra_init,
> +		}
> +	}
> +};

cra_name needs to match an algorithm that has a generic implementation.
It should be "sha3-384", or is your hardware not compatible?
Also does your hardware not support sha3-256 and sha3-512?

- Eric