Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp3919022imu; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 11:56:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5gG7ZAcAEmstgGmdf/coGilzN6gik7oc8dLMwcQuFmFqYAX+9tRSQ1AYDgGcAfxN23GvTc X-Received: by 2002:a65:64c8:: with SMTP id t8mr11929814pgv.31.1546890965393; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 11:56:05 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1546890965; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AIGbUpLoYzSNDEozCEoaZ/bbT/CUwt7cdQ3IHEelroLYQiE9kkC6Hp4M5rfFPNa8M3 C5CEd/Q8ZwdGNCJ6SutJQtdIX9yguNZj/lFiyfd4FQ6qyDizrduGusJUHkOTtx2wHUwZ wwAleMr2LIvpTFOF6ZI5rOUA+HPZceC+PioQIZUC8QLtokmNdbbR3YMLHhssCs+kHVvD upOLCOz6l+Tjn1+GnX++Cugj2jHIw1hKMJxTUvBjn+MdvDZ9t+RhaHjE2jgnE/ww51Cm JDqHitfNfznqQ/XTNNbOWUtsL0Yy5fqzfAO9wjNUEciDCQlN5FV3CXkFP5cvWdogvquj i3rw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :organization:from:references:cc:to:subject:reply-to; bh=8e6ubi4/YTR9lkCXqLTnzYpVXGXBD2pmJoTydRo1+nw=; b=JyNR7vwrTw2WNOxnCzw9xh3+c2+DMTKEQ+Ap9NSiMqdjGdWjN0kH0zcCyUMRMm2yxL dFqyEVE0N2B3fgr4U93IBnf3rCWPhsy9Hcfty5p1lWXYDgQsNbi+M1tYLdPBzsb0cvEI RuIVvqQ/sFrRNCfWLH8m9aTYTjTrxzObWuTIoTd/aW2FEQTfMo/lJ8sZZdL4AxFoRmr/ KS0dOGyu6f6vGmMkWITd9ie06klzP7L32bQvFwBOHhFZMJen9GSvhEXJgJgPfTqc9my7 ZCAcpQghJMq8akh40ABBIouLVlIWQsLbzCum3crE/FRbp9s7Ac3uBoVqgARBRELFvKeb 6UDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d10si9875403pls.170.2019.01.07.11.55.50; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 11:56:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728236AbfAGSRY (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 7 Jan 2019 13:17:24 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:46820 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727998AbfAGSRX (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2019 13:17:23 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id x07IEVHA068948 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 13:17:22 -0500 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2pvbr38j2t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 13:17:21 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:17:19 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:17:17 -0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x07IHGCV58589370 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:17:16 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E806952063; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:17:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.152.96.120] (unknown [9.152.96.120]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F62C52052; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:17:15 +0000 (GMT) Reply-To: mimu@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/15] KVM: s390: restore IAM in get_ipm() when IPM is clean To: pmorel@linux.ibm.com, KVM Mailing List Cc: Linux-S390 Mailing List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm390-list@tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com, Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , Halil Pasic References: <20181219191756.57973-1-mimu@linux.ibm.com> <20181219191756.57973-12-mimu@linux.ibm.com> <08327d88-388e-2ffe-9bd0-b0de2e0a0ff3@linux.ibm.com> From: Michael Mueller Organization: IBM Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 19:17:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <08327d88-388e-2ffe-9bd0-b0de2e0a0ff3@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19010718-0008-0000-0000-000002AC791F X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19010718-0009-0000-0000-00002218847C Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-01-07_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901070156 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03.01.19 16:06, Pierre Morel wrote: > On 19/12/2018 20:17, Michael Mueller wrote: >> The patch adds the parameter irq_flags and allows to >> restore the Interruption Alert Mask (IAM) in the GISA >> atomically while guaranteeing the IPM is clean. >> >> The function returns the IPM of the GISA. If the returned >> value is 0x00 and the IRQ_FLAG_IAM was set, the IAM has >> been restored. >> >> New irq flag: >>    IRQ_FLAG_IAM: When set, the IAM is restored if no ISC bit >>            is set in the IPM, i.e. no new airqs are >>         pending. The test and restore operations >>         are done atomically. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller >> --- >>   arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- >>   1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c >> index 1cc3ad2e6c7e..8307717e3caf 100644 >> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c >> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c >> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ >>   #define IRQ_FLAG_LOCAL    0x8000 /* include local interruption >> pending mask */ >>   #define IRQ_FLAG_FLOATING 0x4000 /* include float interruption >> pending mask */ >>   #define IRQ_FLAG_GISA     0x2000 /* include GISA interruption >> pending mask */ >> +#define IRQ_FLAG_IAM      0x0080 /* when set try to restore IAM */ >>   #define IRQ_MASK_ALL      (IRQ_FLAG_LOCAL | IRQ_FLAG_FLOATING | >> IRQ_FLAG_GISA) >>   #define IRQ_MASK_NO_GISA  (IRQ_MASK_ALL & ~IRQ_FLAG_GISA) >> @@ -253,9 +254,32 @@ static inline void set_ipm_gisc(struct >> kvm_s390_gisa *gisa, u32 gisc) >>       set_bit_inv(IPM_BIT_OFFSET + gisc, (unsigned long *) gisa); >>   } >> -static inline u8 get_ipm(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa) >> +static inline u8 get_ipm(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa, u16 irq_flags) >>   { >> -    return READ_ONCE(gisa->ipm); >> +    u64 word, _word; >> +    u8 ipm; >> + >> +    if (!(irq_flags & IRQ_FLAG_IAM)) >> +        return READ_ONCE(gisa->ipm); >> + >> +    do { >> +        word = READ_ONCE(gisa->u64.word[0]); >> +        ipm = word >> 24; >> +        /* If the GISA is in the alert list, return the IPM. */ >> +        if ((u64)gisa != word >> 32) >> +            return ipm; >> +        /* If the IPM is dirty, return the IPM. */ >> +        if (ipm) >> +            return ipm; >> +        /* >> +         * Try to restore the IAM or loop, if the IPM is dirty >> +         * again or the GISA has been inserted into the alert list. >> +         */ >> +        _word = (word & ~0xffUL) | >> +            container_of(gisa, struct sie_page2, gisa)->kvm->arch.iam; >> +    } while (cmpxchg(&gisa->u64.word[0], word, _word) != _word); >> + >> +    return 0; >>   } > > Personal opinion, but this function do more than just getting the IPM, > shouldn't it be reflected in the function name? The main task of this function is to fetch the IPM. The additional functionality is expressed in the flags. A call like get_ipm_try_iam_restore(kvm, 0) would be more confusing. > >>   static inline void clear_ipm_gisc(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa, u32 gisc) >> @@ -277,7 +301,7 @@ static inline unsigned long pending_irqs(struct >> kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 irq_flags) >>       if (irq_flags & IRQ_FLAG_FLOATING) >>           pending_irqs |= vcpu->kvm->arch.float_int.pending_irqs; >>       if (irq_flags & IRQ_FLAG_GISA) >> -        pending_irqs |= get_ipm(vcpu->kvm->arch.gisa) << >> +        pending_irqs |= get_ipm(vcpu->kvm->arch.gisa, irq_flags) << >>               IRQ_PEND_IO_ISC_7; >>       return pending_irqs; >>   } >> @@ -1574,7 +1598,7 @@ static int get_top_gisa_isc(struct kvm *kvm, u64 >> isc_mask, u32 schid) >>       if (!kvm->arch.gisa) >>           goto out; >> -    active_mask = (isc_mask & get_ipm(kvm->arch.gisa) << 24) << 32; >> +    active_mask = (isc_mask & get_ipm(kvm->arch.gisa, IRQ_FLAG_IAM) >> << 24) << 32; > > why do we need to set the IAM here? Yes, it should not be required, only when a vcpu goes into wait state. > >>       while (active_mask) { >>           isc = __fls(active_mask) ^ (BITS_PER_LONG - 1); >>           if (tac_ipm_gisc(kvm->arch.gisa, isc)) >> @@ -2060,7 +2084,7 @@ static int get_all_floating_irqs(struct kvm >> *kvm, u8 __user *usrbuf, u64 len) >>       max_irqs = len / sizeof(struct kvm_s390_irq); >>       if (kvm->arch.gisa && >> -        get_ipm(kvm->arch.gisa)) { >> +        get_ipm(kvm->arch.gisa, IRQ_FLAG_IAM)) { > > and here? Yes, it should not be required, only when a vcpu goes into wait state. > >>           for (i = 0; i <= MAX_ISC; i++) { >>               if (n == max_irqs) { >>                   /* signal userspace to try again */ >> > >