Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263836AbUA0PDe (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:03:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263946AbUA0PDe (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:03:34 -0500 Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com ([192.108.102.143]:9942 "EHLO smtp-send.myrealbox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263836AbUA0PDd (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:03:33 -0500 Message-ID: <40167DCA.7040006@myrealbox.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 07:03:38 -0800 From: walt Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040125 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Kernel Subject: ACPI versus VIA IDE controller? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 739 Lines: 18 I know there has been a problem getting the VIA ide controller to cooperate with ACPI, but I saw a bunch of acpi changes coming from Linus today so I reenabled acpi in my 2.6.2-rc2 again just out of curiosity. I still see the message about the VIA ide controller: ACPI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin A of device 0000:00:11.1 - using IRQ 255 I haven't exercised the machine much, but it all seems to be working just fine so far. Are there any known risks to running the machine in this mode? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/