Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp3934065imu; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 12:12:00 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7zBQ6c+Xa4jDkJa8F7paQ0+HCCyGQcDi38jNiZ1FpLFCsxGUPhJgRCm3xWe1mcicqF1xHr X-Received: by 2002:a63:d70e:: with SMTP id d14mr12199755pgg.159.1546891920721; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 12:12:00 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1546891920; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mfbHfpNkRpIF6pbzVdev/K9fffTIHgxkN8w/sEIPGY9mW1k6xMxrmcY4xQtwqpSq6Z SpRvij4gkZEnm2NRCtZun4pi/jzLngWnplE0GSdiBQ8u42bMhgBe+7RYtD8TBUW9hy7t yNz/vsj1L4aTvKLeaaAIO/q6jke4JCHfSJX38TRPbxbOO+B99t+5uR52WVKuaz7VZQsT EsrjX0N7iDr2rz3UVBUDs7e5llhs81v3DpoDapU2hwL6BteU2aa1/pfGCPc9NNUyiOv0 n0GRJqOnL9Ke5CooVeRQfjJUqBPdEFU+pJuRXkuQjzitOoCO+AnvJWWeWDcGzC8e/YeM fxuw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=gGx9Mlgox1l40jsuvfHBve9eZwlJMynUQ0BSc/cC/Xc=; b=UKNC/nDu/oFvVqblKcqt2BRlK5ZrT8l60CDNp83FH8/W9CSLXRRQ6OUOW5vhix3pGT QBpw5r5RlmIjVI1JBhnX+BAD2zHZnQNyTUf/6jj3txKR0oE5wj0BbW/OCHaTZicAG0pD ciGUApOffIPMVVG6qcT5KehHQFSr11ookZNDvpMoQ9XKzCf64Cj+OKp0pS/6F+0Eqthz 0U/6GFgO/J4TW5JAS5hd/9gndHYbswN0rQufzaC6HdQ9BcRZCskBI/dZzfmNMIGtRof6 0I3jq8ZsI6Cqy7i3epoMlh3nFzdXqY4xika6NVoYKJwbKEdbhYfh2Jc4vqqs2Ys4rDTr TwLA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w19si7607932pgf.573.2019.01.07.12.11.45; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 12:12:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727139AbfAGSni (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 7 Jan 2019 13:43:38 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:35670 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726718AbfAGSni (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2019 13:43:38 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id x07IY85R119446 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 13:43:37 -0500 Received: from e16.ny.us.ibm.com (e16.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.206]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2pvba2uerm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 13:43:37 -0500 Received: from localhost by e16.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:43:36 -0000 Received: from b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.25) by e16.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.203) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:43:33 -0000 Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.111]) by b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x07IhWbU22872174 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:43:32 GMT Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE7FEAC060; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:43:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BDDAAC062; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:43:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.41.179.222] (unknown [9.41.179.222]) by b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:43:31 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon (occ): Fix potential integer overflow To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20190107183431.GA12428@embeddedor> From: Eddie James Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 12:43:31 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190107183431.GA12428@embeddedor> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19010718-0072-0000-0000-000003E5D0DF X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00010362; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000273; SDB=6.01143142; UDB=6.00595100; IPR=6.00923392; MB=3.00025019; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-01-07 18:43:35 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19010718-0073-0000-0000-00004AB85C93 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-01-07_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901070158 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/07/2019 12:34 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Cast get_unaligned_be32(...) to u64 in order to give the compiler > complete information about the proper arithmetic to use and avoid > a potential integer overflow. > > Notice that such function call is used in contexts that expect > expressions of type u64 (64 bits, unsigned); and the following > expressions are currently being evaluated using 32-bit > arithmetic: > > val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) * > occ->powr_sample_time_us; > > val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdn.update_tag) * > occ->powr_sample_time_us; Thanks, Reviewed-by: Eddie James > > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1442357 ("Unintentional integer overflow") > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1442476 ("Unintentional integer overflow") > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1442508 ("Unintentional integer overflow") > Fixes: ff692d80b2e2 ("hwmon (occ): Add sensor types and versions") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva > --- > drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c b/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c > index 423903f87955..391118c8aae8 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c > @@ -380,8 +380,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_1(struct device *dev, > val *= 1000000ULL; > break; > case 2: > - val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) * > - occ->powr_sample_time_us; > + val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) * > + occ->powr_sample_time_us; > break; > case 3: > val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->value) * 1000000ULL; > @@ -425,8 +425,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_2(struct device *dev, > &power->update_tag); > break; > case 2: > - val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) * > - occ->powr_sample_time_us; > + val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) * > + occ->powr_sample_time_us; > break; > case 3: > val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->value) * 1000000ULL; > @@ -463,8 +463,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev, > &power->system.update_tag); > break; > case 2: > - val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->system.update_tag) * > - occ->powr_sample_time_us; > + val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->system.update_tag) * > + occ->powr_sample_time_us; > break; > case 3: > val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->system.value) * 1000000ULL; > @@ -477,8 +477,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev, > &power->proc.update_tag); > break; > case 6: > - val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->proc.update_tag) * > - occ->powr_sample_time_us; > + val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->proc.update_tag) * > + occ->powr_sample_time_us; > break; > case 7: > val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->proc.value) * 1000000ULL; > @@ -491,8 +491,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev, > &power->vdd.update_tag); > break; > case 10: > - val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdd.update_tag) * > - occ->powr_sample_time_us; > + val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdd.update_tag) * > + occ->powr_sample_time_us; > break; > case 11: > val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->vdd.value) * 1000000ULL; > @@ -505,8 +505,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev, > &power->vdn.update_tag); > break; > case 14: > - val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdn.update_tag) * > - occ->powr_sample_time_us; > + val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdn.update_tag) * > + occ->powr_sample_time_us; > break; > case 15: > val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->vdn.value) * 1000000ULL;