Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263125AbUA0SC4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:02:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263711AbUA0SC4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:02:56 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:64897 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263125AbUA0SCy (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:02:54 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 19:02:51 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: jim.houston@comcast.net Cc: akpm@osdl.org, george@mvista.com, amitkale@emsyssoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] kgdb-x86_64-support.patch for 2.6.2-rc1-mm3 Message-Id: <20040127190251.4edb873d.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <1075225399.1020.239.camel@new.localdomain> References: <20040127030529.8F860C60FC@h00e098094f32.ne.client2.attbi.com> <20040127155619.7efec284.ak@suse.de> <1075225399.1020.239.camel@new.localdomain> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1459 Lines: 43 On 27 Jan 2004 12:43:20 -0500 Jim Houston wrote: . > > It looks like we were working in lock step. I had been meaning to > update the patch so when I saw that Andrew had dropped it from > 2.6.2-rc1-mm3 it seemed like a good time. > > I'll leave it to you and Andrew to decide how we should resolve our > conflicting patches. If yours works on ethernet please use yours. Mine didn't. > arch/x86_64/Kconfig > arch/x86_64/Kconfig.kgdb > We used a different approach to selecting DEBUG_INFO. > I was not really happy with the way select DEBUG_INFO worked. You reverted it back? What I did was to change all not really kgdb specific CONFIG_KGDB uses in the main kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO (mostly CFI support). I don't feel strongly about it, but this way there is no reference to an unknown config symbol in mainline. Also DEBUG_INFO including CFI makes sense I think. Putting the kgdb options into a separate sourced file is a good idea. This should decrease future conflicts. > include/asm-x86_64/kgdb_local.h > This file seems to be missing from your patch. Maybe I'm > missing something. In my patch it is a copy of the i386 > version. Probably my fault. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/