Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 8 Jan 2019 10:53:06 -0700
From:   Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
To:     Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
        luto@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, serge@hallyn.com,
        keescook@chromium.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jannh@google.com,
        oleg@redhat.com, cyphar@cyphar.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dancol@google.com,
        timmurray@google.com, fweimer@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
        x86@kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] selftests: add tests for pidfd_send_signal()
Message-ID: <20190108175306.GF29009@cisco>
References: <20190102161654.9093-1-christian@brauner.io>
 <20190102161654.9093-2-christian@brauner.io>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190102161654.9093-2-christian@brauner.io>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 05:16:54PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> +			/*
> +			 * Stop the child so we can inspect whether we have
> +			 * recycled pid PID_RECYCLE.
> +			 */
> +			close(pipe_fds[0]);
> +			ret = kill(recycled_pid, SIGSTOP);
> +			close(pipe_fds[1]);
> +			if (ret) {
> +				(void)wait_for_pid(recycled_pid);
> +				_exit(PIDFD_ERROR);
> +			}

Sorry for being late to the party, but I wonder if this whole thing
couldn't be simplified with /proc/sys/kenrel/ns_last_pid?

Tycho