Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265745AbUA0V7v (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:59:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265777AbUA0V7v (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:59:51 -0500 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.133]:65414 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265745AbUA0V7t (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:59:49 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.6] PCI Scan all functions From: John Rose To: Greg KH Cc: Jake Moilanen , Andrew Morton , lkml , torvalds@osdl.org In-Reply-To: <20040127211253.GA27583@kroah.com> References: <1075222501.1030.45.camel@magik> <20040127211253.GA27583@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1075240636.10285.38.camel@verve> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:57:17 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 922 Lines: 25 Hi- > Heh, I think the PPC64 people need to get together and all talk about > this, as I just got a different patch, that solves much the same problem > from John Rose (it's on the linuxppc64 mailing list.) > > Can you two get together and not patch the same section of code to do > the same thing in different ways? These patches don't address the same problem. Jake's problem has to do with pci_scan_slot() ending too soon when going from function 0->7 at boot time. My problem has to do with pci_scan_slot() going too far from function 0->7 at dlpar add time. Greg, will follow up with you outside of this thread. Thanks- John -- John Rose - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/