Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20181109000800.15431-1-jprvita@gmail.com> <83CA40B2-1AF3-49FA-9F94-C84A3C916583@holtmann.org>
 <CA+A7VXXfdyLWMpNaEzUzDe6PiktOKb5oJrufYrGeTyXyXChQfw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+A7VXX2fA5gC1_-nwFDswvB+we3R69ZTNiGDmrO+sftRdxxpg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+A7VXX2fA5gC1_-nwFDswvB+we3R69ZTNiGDmrO+sftRdxxpg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_Paulo_Rechi_Vita?= <jprvita@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Jan 2019 16:26:01 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+A7VXXarPAb+vFNTqZDhpng_niLjSCxqEQdLLV9eGAn+PPUXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iwlwifi: Load firmware exclusively for Intel WiFi
To:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc:     Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
        Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
        Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Upstreaming Team <linux@endlessm.com>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_Paulo_Rechi_Vita?= <jprvita@endlessm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello Marcel,

On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jo=C3=A3o Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@gmail.c=
om> wrote:
>
> Hello Marcel,
>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 4:36 PM Jo=C3=A3o Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@gmail.=
com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Marcel,
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 11:49 PM Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> w=
rote:
> > >
> > > our hardware teams from the Bluetooth and WiFi side really need to lo=
ok at this.
>
> Were you able to get attention from the hardware teams with the logs
> I've provided? Are there any news or an idea of when / if we can
> expect this to be fixed in firmware? If not, do you have suggestions
> for an alternative solution?
>

Sorry to bother you again with this, but I'd really like to figure out
some way forward here. Did you get any feedback from the hardware
teams? Otherwise, I understand having an inter-dependency between the
wifi and bt kernel modules is not desirable, so do you have any
suggestion on how to solve this without adding this dependency?

--
Jo=C3=A3o Paulo Rechi Vita
http://about.me/jprvita