Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 9 Jan 2019 11:48:52 +0800
From:   WANG Chao <chao.wang@ucloud.cn>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
        srinivas.eeda@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] treewide: replace RETPOLINE with CONFIG_RETPOLINE
Message-ID: <20190109034852.GA51165@WANG-Chaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
References: <20181210163725.95977-1-chao.wang@ucloud.cn>
 <20181221093347.GA88654@WANG-Chaos-MacBook-Pro.local>
 <20181221104705.GA4750@zn.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181221104705.GA4750@zn.tnic>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 12/21/18 at 11:47P, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 05:33:47PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
> > On 12/11/18 at 12:37P, WANG Chao wrote:
> > > Since commit 4cd24de3a098 ("x86/retpoline: Make CONFIG_RETPOLINE depend
> > > on compiler support"), RETPOLINE has been replaced by CONFIG_RETPOLINE.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 4cd24de3a098 ("x86/retpoline: Make CONFIG_RETPOLINE depend on compiler support")
> > > Signed-off-by: WANG Chao <chao.wang@ucloud.cn>
> > 
> > ping ...
> 
> This one somehow slipped through the cracks... :-\
> 
> Ok, let's see: this could be relevant for the case when a module built
> with a compiler which doesn't support retpolines, gets loaded on a
> system which is built with retpolines.
> 
> Which is pretty seldom as the majority of setups out there should have
> a retpoline-enabled compiler. And should not allow loading external
> modules anyway, but that's a different story.
> 
> So, this close to the merge window, I'm inclined to delay this one after
> it and have it take the x86/urgent fixes path. Unless someone screams
> and says that patch breaks his system. I haven't seen any reports about
> it so far so...

Hi, Boris.

Please pick up this one in x86/urgent.

Thanks
Chao