Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp370056imu; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 22:15:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6aYINRNj8Ms+M5/NOgqI0IdnpaX0IYJKXBKzXwrGDuPkk7t8deqNCoab6Xvk/n0SndK/eL X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9a07:: with SMTP id v7mr4640643plp.247.1547014539847; Tue, 08 Jan 2019 22:15:39 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1547014539; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=J8nZQ0rXlewQHAKgEQcT1pNVMP1f7mLrTMYqxipWxyB2Is0u9ggPUyyByGqGY1ezGi GCK+Bu7b3Gt1l/GnKJitop9oXlk8c8Hk65CB9tUbZNVJOnz6iyze1CK+sdZ2F21XngwI Av+Rq1sN856vVAdvv5AKWGSYV0vw4idbv9qobW97Cg4oJJoFk6VZihTUIhFJY0zJhrBy hqe+fZErygkzzz3gyDgT8uNDMiIzZkgJnhUlA2enwi+F7BBBujGozpKtlc4Rxsh4tqjO ggQgnciox8NKqK3OXe2X1HEabNb/XuJ4k62I6PV5uI0MPOV6cNni6ATCBU+BiaxR9qrq KUEw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=fhKkwSnbThbn5pxwH7LqHsl37ikC/XePAzmQDCM8hUw=; b=ABA3jShTjNcvJWTuF6RvmZ0T4lIM1+awynleCBPQM8rrjnNofjv1iHg6TZUVubWjpa qfQ+h0uCLfIPjj1oL0/aCMTfCFnl1YzM1prNxh+NzsRVHpTd6E7CJMfmiG8CGHNflGkG 0L6K1mOg/4pYT3yzYI0Mp007ZXz8gmIayUaTpOxuuuG0sN9QRMGcAkKH6oO/Z/jtZ65m DAn6RejKWNzrCNj+DrU856kKYg+zExtCBjDqQ0q60+rFpRcfzxGBkNh4+SeKqZGxJuOr SDlfd213/442bHmdFxWgFOh0irsF3uA4PGFy1N5isv88ZcafNhOI8QmetzRIGb/JRtjf bqDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k11si35528304pgh.132.2019.01.08.22.15.23; Tue, 08 Jan 2019 22:15:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729667AbfAIGNI (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 9 Jan 2019 01:13:08 -0500 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:48714 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725440AbfAIGNI (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2019 01:13:08 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 4BB32A909AEB3A4953A9; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 14:13:06 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.134.22.195) by DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 14:13:03 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix sbi->extent_list corruption issue To: Jaegeuk Kim CC: Sahitya Tummala , , References: <1543207640-31033-1-git-send-email-stummala@codeaurora.org> <20190104080535.GB8475@codeaurora.org> <20190104203329.GA57873@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <0197c64e-6419-db96-d8a9-d17f446aa9c1@huawei.com> <20190109043801.GB55897@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <9e8fb00b-75e7-1f69-0255-26de800a6688@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 14:13:02 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190109043801.GB55897@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/1/9 12:38, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 01/07, Chao Yu wrote: >> On 2019/1/5 4:33, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>> On 01/04, Sahitya Tummala wrote: >>>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:17:20AM +0530, Sahitya Tummala wrote: >>>>> When there is a failure in f2fs_fill_super() after/during >>>>> the recovery of fsync'd nodes, it frees the current sbi and >>>>> retries again. This time the mount is successful, but the files >>>>> that got recovered before retry, still holds the extent tree, >>>>> whose extent nodes list is corrupted since sbi and sbi->extent_list >>>>> is freed up. The list_del corruption issue is observed when the >>>>> file system is getting unmounted and when those recoverd files extent >>>>> node is being freed up in the below context. >>>>> >>>>> list_del corruption. prev->next should be fffffff1e1ef5480, but was (null) >>>>> <...> >>>>> kernel BUG at kernel/msm-4.14/lib/list_debug.c:53! >>>>> task: fffffff1f46f2280 task.stack: ffffff8008068000 >>>>> lr : __list_del_entry_valid+0x94/0xb4 >>>>> pc : __list_del_entry_valid+0x94/0xb4 >>>>> <...> >>>>> Call trace: >>>>> __list_del_entry_valid+0x94/0xb4 >>>>> __release_extent_node+0xb0/0x114 >>>>> __free_extent_tree+0x58/0x7c >>>>> f2fs_shrink_extent_tree+0xdc/0x3b0 >>>>> f2fs_leave_shrinker+0x28/0x7c >>>>> f2fs_put_super+0xfc/0x1e0 >>>>> generic_shutdown_super+0x70/0xf4 >>>>> kill_block_super+0x2c/0x5c >>>>> kill_f2fs_super+0x44/0x50 >>>>> deactivate_locked_super+0x60/0x8c >>>>> deactivate_super+0x68/0x74 >>>>> cleanup_mnt+0x40/0x78 >>>>> __cleanup_mnt+0x1c/0x28 >>>>> task_work_run+0x48/0xd0 >>>>> do_notify_resume+0x678/0xe98 >>>>> work_pending+0x8/0x14 >>>>> >>>>> Fix this by cleaning up inodes, extent tree and nodes of those >>>>> recovered files before freeing up sbi and before next retry. >>>>> >>>> Hi Jaegeuk, Chao, >>>> >>>> I have observed another scenario where the similar list corruption issue >>>> can happen with sbi->inode_list as well. If recover_fsync_data() >>>> fails at some point in write_checkpoint() due to some error and if >>>> those recovered inodes are still dirty, then after the mount is >>>> successful, this issue is observed when that dirty inode is under >>>> writeback. >>> >>> recover_fsync_data() does iget/iput in pair, and destroy_fsync_dnodes() drops >>> its dirty list and call iput(), when there is an error. So, after then, there'd >>> be no dirty inodes. If there's no error, checkpoint() flushes quota/dentry pages >>> in dirty inodes as well. Can we check where this dirty inode came from? >> >> I guess it comes from: >> >> f2fs_recover_fsync_data() >> >> /* Needed for iput() to work correctly and not trash data */ >> sbi->sb->s_flags |= SB_ACTIVE; >> >> iput_final() >> >> if (!drop && (sb->s_flags & SB_ACTIVE)) { >> inode_add_lru(inode); >> spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); >> return; >> } >> >> So dirty data in those inode can be remained after iput(), then meta/node >> can be persisted during next checkpoint, if checkpoint failed due to error, >> dirty inode remain in system. IIUC. > > > 749 err = recover_data(sbi, &inode_list, &tmp_inode_list, &dir_list); > 750 if (!err) > 751 f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !list_empty(&inode_list)); > 752 else { > 753 /* restore s_flags to let iput() trash data */ > 754 sbi->sb->s_flags = s_flags; > 755 } > > We deactivate sb before iput? We only restore s_flags in error path of recover_data? I remember Sahitya said his case is encountering error in later checkpoint()? Thanks, > >> >>> >>> Oh, one sceanrio can be an error by f2fs_disable_checkpoint() which will do GC. >>> >>>> >>>> [ 90.400500] list_del corruption. prev->next should be ffffffed1f566208, but was (null) >>>> [ 90.675349] Call trace: >>>> [ 90.677869] __list_del_entry_valid+0x94/0xb4 >>>> [ 90.682351] remove_dirty_inode+0xac/0x114 >>>> [ 90.686563] __f2fs_write_data_pages+0x6a8/0x6c8 >>>> [ 90.691302] f2fs_write_data_pages+0x40/0x4c >>>> [ 90.695695] do_writepages+0x80/0xf0 >>>> [ 90.699372] __writeback_single_inode+0xdc/0x4ac >>>> [ 90.704113] writeback_sb_inodes+0x280/0x440 >>>> [ 90.708501] wb_writeback+0x1b8/0x3d0 >>>> [ 90.712267] wb_workfn+0x1a8/0x4d4 >>>> [ 90.715765] process_one_work+0x1c0/0x3d4 >>>> [ 90.719883] worker_thread+0x224/0x344 >>>> [ 90.723739] kthread+0x120/0x130 >>>> [ 90.727055] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 >>>> >>>> I think it is better to cleanup those inodes completely before freeing sbi >>>> and before next retry as done in this patch. Would you like to re-consider >>>> this patch for this new issue? >>> >>> The patch was merged in mainline already. >>> Could you take a look at this patch? >>> >>> >From cb1d20e640402beed300c2bdce79311ee8a781ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Jaegeuk Kim >>> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 12:29:00 -0800 >>> Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: sync filesystem after roll-forward recovery >> >> You mean android kernel mainline? > > I meant the previous patch was upstreamed. We need another patch to address this > second issue. > > Thanks, > >> >> Thanks, >> >>> >>> Some works after roll-forward recovery can get an error which will release >>> all the data structures. Let's flush them in order to make it clean. >>> >>> One possible corruption came from: >>> >>> [ 90.400500] list_del corruption. prev->next should be ffffffed1f566208, but was (null) >>> [ 90.675349] Call trace: >>> [ 90.677869] __list_del_entry_valid+0x94/0xb4 >>> [ 90.682351] remove_dirty_inode+0xac/0x114 >>> [ 90.686563] __f2fs_write_data_pages+0x6a8/0x6c8 >>> [ 90.691302] f2fs_write_data_pages+0x40/0x4c >>> [ 90.695695] do_writepages+0x80/0xf0 >>> [ 90.699372] __writeback_single_inode+0xdc/0x4ac >>> [ 90.704113] writeback_sb_inodes+0x280/0x440 >>> [ 90.708501] wb_writeback+0x1b8/0x3d0 >>> [ 90.712267] wb_workfn+0x1a8/0x4d4 >>> [ 90.715765] process_one_work+0x1c0/0x3d4 >>> [ 90.719883] worker_thread+0x224/0x344 >>> [ 90.723739] kthread+0x120/0x130 >>> [ 90.727055] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 >>> >>> Reported-by: Sahitya Tummala >>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim >>> --- >>> fs/f2fs/super.c | 8 ++++++-- >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c >>> index 547cb7459be7..bb02186293a3 100644 >>> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c >>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c >>> @@ -3357,7 +3357,7 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) >>> if (test_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT)) { >>> err = f2fs_disable_checkpoint(sbi); >>> if (err) >>> - goto free_meta; >>> + goto sync_free_meta; >>> } else if (is_set_ckpt_flags(sbi, CP_DISABLED_FLAG)) { >>> f2fs_enable_checkpoint(sbi); >>> } >>> @@ -3370,7 +3370,7 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) >>> /* After POR, we can run background GC thread.*/ >>> err = f2fs_start_gc_thread(sbi); >>> if (err) >>> - goto free_meta; >>> + goto sync_free_meta; >>> } >>> kvfree(options); >>> >>> @@ -3392,6 +3392,10 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) >>> f2fs_update_time(sbi, REQ_TIME); >>> return 0; >>> >>> +sync_free_meta: >>> + /* safe to flush all the data */ >>> + sync_filesystem(sbi->sb); >>> + >>> free_meta: >>> /* flush dirty orphan inode objects */ >>> f2fs_sync_inode_meta(sbi); >>> > > . >